FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360  
361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   >>  
two millions this session, for the defense of Portugal. Nay, even in the treaty with the Prince Regent of Portugal, there is an article which stipulates that we shall not make peace with France unless Portugal shall be restored to the house of Braganza. And has the Prince of Brazil's religion been considered evidence of his connection with the enemy? You have not one ally who is not Catholic; and will you continue to disqualify Irish Catholics, who fight with you and your allies, because their religion is evidence of disaffection? But if the Catholic religion be this evidence of repugnance, is Protestantism the proof of affection to the Crown and government of England? For an answer, let us look at America. In vain did you send your armies there; in vain did you appeal to the ties of common origin and common religion. America joined with France, and adopted a connection with a Catholic government. Turn to Prussia, and behold whether her religion has had any effect on her political character. Did the faith of Denmark prevent the attack on Copenhagen? It is admitted on all sides that the Catholics have demonstrated their allegiance in as strong a manner as the willing expenditure of blood and treasure can evince. And remember that the French go not near so far in their defense of Catholicism, as you in your hatred of it in your own subjects and your reverence for it in your allies. They have not scrupled to pull down the ancient fabrics of superstition in the countries subjected to their arms. Upon a review of these facts, I am justified in assuming that there is nothing inherent in Catholicism which either proves disaffection, or disqualifies for public trusts. The immediate inference is that they have as much right as any dissentient sect to the enjoyment of civil privileges and a participation of equal rights; that they are as fit morally and politically to hold offices in the State or seats in Parliament. Those who dispute the conclusion will find it their duty to controvert the reasoning on which it is founded. I do not believe the Church is in any danger; but if it is, I am sure that we are in a wrong way to secure it. If our laws will battle against Providence, there can be no doubt of the issue of the conflict between the ordinances of God and the decrees of man: transient must be the struggle, rapid the event. Let us suppose an extreme case, but applicable to the present point: Suppose the Thames were to inunda
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360  
361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   >>  



Top keywords:

religion

 

evidence

 
Catholic
 

Portugal

 

Catholics

 

connection

 

government

 

disaffection

 

allies

 

France


Prince

 
defense
 
common
 

Catholicism

 
America
 

privileges

 

enjoyment

 

offices

 

rights

 

politically


morally

 

participation

 

disqualifies

 

justified

 
assuming
 

review

 
superstition
 

countries

 

subjected

 

inherent


inference

 
dissentient
 

proves

 

public

 

trusts

 
transient
 

struggle

 
decrees
 

conflict

 

ordinances


Suppose

 

Thames

 
inunda
 

present

 

suppose

 
extreme
 

applicable

 
reasoning
 

founded

 

controvert