FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673  
674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   >>   >|  
who held that there are no different species of friendship, by reason of its admitting of degree, were led by insufficient proof." In this way to exceed reason or to fall short thereof belongs to sins specifically different, in so far as they result from different motives. Reply Obj. 2: It is not the sinner's intention to depart from reason; and so sins of excess and deficiency do not become of one kind through departing from the one rectitude of reason. On the other hand, sometimes he who utters a falsehood, intends to hide the truth, wherefore in this respect, it matters not whether he tells more or less. If, however, departure from the truth be not outside the intention, it is evident that then one is moved by different causes to tell more or less; and in this respect there are different kinds of falsehood, as is evident of the _boaster,_ who exceeds in telling untruths for the sake of fame, and the _cheat,_ who tells less than the truth, in order to escape from paying his debts. This also explains how some false opinions are contrary to one another. Reply Obj. 3: One may be prodigal and illiberal with regard to different objects: for instance one may be illiberal [*Cf. II-II, Q. 119, A. 1, ad 1] in taking what one ought not: and nothing hinders contraries from being in the same subject, in different respects. ________________________ NINTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 72, Art. 9] Whether Sins Differ Specifically in Respect of Different Circumstances? Objection 1: It would seem that vices and sins differ in respect of different circumstances. For, as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv), "evil results from each single defect." Now individual defects are corruptions of individual circumstances. Therefore from the corruption of each circumstance there results a corresponding species of sin. Obj. 2: Further, sins are human acts. But human acts sometimes take their species from circumstances, as stated above (Q. 18, A. 10). Therefore sins differ specifically according as different circumstances are corrupted. Obj. 3: Further, diverse species are assigned to gluttony, according to the words contained in the following verse: "Hastily, sumptuously, too much, greedily, daintily." Now these pertain to various circumstances, for "hastily" means sooner than is right; "too much," more than is right, and so on with the others. Therefore the species of sin is diversified according to the various circumstances. _On the contra
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673  
674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
circumstances
 

species

 

reason

 

respect

 

Therefore

 

Further

 
falsehood
 

illiberal

 

differ

 

results


individual
 

evident

 

specifically

 
intention
 
Whether
 
pertain
 

Circumstances

 
Respect
 

hastily

 

Specifically


Differ

 

Objection

 

Different

 

contra

 

diversified

 
subject
 

hinders

 
contraries
 

sooner

 

ARTICLE


respects

 

daintily

 

gluttony

 

assigned

 
diverse
 

circumstance

 
corruption
 

corrupted

 

contained

 

stated


Dionysius

 

greedily

 

single

 
corruptions
 

defects

 
Hastily
 
defect
 

sumptuously

 
deficiency
 
excess