s of the Gospels, differing from it in some small
particulars which most strongly suggest diversity of authorship. (c)
Much of the section might have been constructed out of the other
Gospels and Acts; _e.g._ ver. 9 is thought to be derived from John xx.
14, and ver. 14 from John xx. 26-29. (d) Mary Magdalene is introduced
as though she had not been mentioned previously; but she has already
appeared thrice in Mark (xv. 40, 47; xvi. 1). On the other hand, it is
obvious that the Gospel could never have ended with the words "for they
{63} were afraid," in ver. 8. All the old Latin MSS. contain the
present section except k, and perhaps originally A. The evidence of
the Vatican and the Sinaitic MSS. is not so strong as it appears to be
at first sight. The end of Mark in the Sinaitic was actually written
by the same scribe as the man who wrote the New Testament in the
Vatican MS. And the way in which he has arranged the conclusion of the
Gospel in both MSS. suggests that the MSS. from which the Sinaitic and
the Vatican were copied, both contained this or a similar section.
Moreover, there is considerable reason for thinking that he acted under
the personal influence of Eusebius. The verses are attested by
Irenaeus, and apparently by Justin and Hermas, and were therefore
regarded as authentic, or at least as truthful, by educated men at
Lyons and Rome, in the 2nd century. A possible solution is offered by
an Armenian MS. (A.D. 986), which assigns the section to the "presbyter
Ariston." This is probably the presbyter Aristion whom Papias
describes as a disciple of the Lord (Eusebius, _H. E._ iii. 39). The
conclusion of St. Mark's MS. probably became accidentally detached, and
vanished soon after his death, and the Church may well have requested
one who knew the Lord to supply the deficiency.
[1] Eusebius, _H. E._ iii. 39.
[2] _Op. cit._ iii. 39.
[3] Eusebius, _H. E._ vi. 14.
[4] Also in Matt. xxvii. 46. Observe also the explanation of Beelzebub
(iii. 22), Gehenna (ix. 43), Bartimaeus (x. 46), Golgotha (xv. 22).
Also the explanation of Jewish customs in vii. 3, 4; xiv. 12.
{64}
CHAPTER V
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. LUKE
[Sidenote: The Author.]
The evidence for believing that the third Gospel was written by St.
Luke, the friend of St. Paul, is very strong. In the 2nd century both
this Gospel and Acts were attributed to him. St. Irenaeus, about A.D.
185, writes: "Luke, also, the compani
|