FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584  
585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   >>   >|  
the belief that it was in the course of ultimate extinction. Let me ask why they made provision that the source of slavery--the African slave-trade--should be cut off at the end of twenty years? Why did they make provision that in all the new territory we owned at that time slavery should be forever inhibited? Why stop its spread in one direction, and cut off its source in another, if they did not look to its being placed in the course of its ultimate extinction? Again: the institution of slavery is only mentioned in the Constitution of the United States two or three times, and in neither of these cases does the word "slavery" or "negro race" occur; but covert language is used each time, and for a purpose full of significance. What is the language in regard to the prohibition of the African slave-trade? It runs in about this way: "The migration or importation of such persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight." The next allusion in the Constitution to the question of slavery and the black race is on the subject of the basis of representation, and there the language used is: "Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other persons." It says "persons," not slaves, not negroes; but this "three-fifths" can be applied to no other class among us than the negroes. Lastly, in the provision for the reclamation of fugitive slaves, it is said: "No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall in consequence of any law or regulation therein be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due." There again there is no mention of the word "negro" or of slavery. In all three of these places, being the only allusions to slavery in the instrument, covert language is used. Language is used not suggesting that slavery existed or that the black race were among us. And I understand the contemporaneous history of those times to be that covert language was used with a purpose, and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584  
585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
slavery
 

language

 

persons

 

service

 

covert

 

provision

 
States
 

Constitution

 

fifths

 

slaves


negroes

 

purpose

 

extinction

 

ultimate

 

source

 

African

 

Lastly

 

applied

 

contemporaneous

 
number

adding
 
numbers
 
determined
 

including

 

understand

 
Indians
 

history

 
excluding
 

fugitive

 
consequence

mention

 
regulation
 
respective
 

discharged

 
places
 
person
 

existed

 
delivered
 

instrument

 

escaping


allusions

 
Language
 

suggesting

 

thereof

 

reclamation

 

existing

 
institution
 
mentioned
 

direction

 
United