'Fortnightly Review' for June, 1869, pp. 684-5.
[11] 'Utilitarianism,' p. 267.
[12] 'Utilitarianism,' pp. 69, 70.
[13] 'Les legistes leur fournirent au besoin l'appui du droit contre le
droit meme.'--De Tocqueville, 'L'Ancien Regime,' p. 567.
[14] 'Utilitarianism,' pp. 72, 73.
[15] 'Utilitarianism,' p. 71.
[16] 'Utilitarianism,' pp. 81, 82.
[17] 'Utilitarianism,' pp. 84, 85.
[18] Ibid. p. 85.
[19] 'Utilitarianism,' pp. 86, 87.
[20] 'Utilitarianism,' p. 94.
[21] Ibid. pp. 94, 95.
CHAPTER II.
_HISTORY'S SCIENTIFIC PRETENSIONS_.
_Warwick._ There is a history in all men's lives,
Figuring the nature of the times deceased;
The which observed, a man may prophesy,
With a near aim, of the main chance of things
As yet not come to life, which in their seeds,
And weak beginnings, lie intreasured.
Such things become the hatch and brood of time;
And, by the necessary form of this,
King Richard might create a perfect guess,
That great Northumberland, then false to him,
Would, of that seed, grow to a greater falseness,
Which should not find a ground to root upon,
Unless on you.
_King Henry._ Are these things, then, necessities?
_King Henry IV._ Part II. Act. 3, Sc. I.
When equally competent thinkers appear to take directly opposite views
of a matter of purely speculative interest, it will commonly be found
that their differences arise from their using the same words in
different senses, or from their being, by some other cause, prevented
from thoroughly apprehending each other's meaning. An illustration is
afforded by the controversy regarding the possibility of constructing a
Science of History, which could scarcely have been so much prolonged if
all who have taken part in it had begun by defining their terms, had
agreed to and adhered to the same definitions, and had always kept
steadily in view the points really in debate. If the word 'science' had
been used only in the restricted, though rather inaccurate sense in
which it is sometimes employed by some of the most distinguished of the
disputants, there would have been less question as to its applicability
to history. No one doubts that from an extensive historical survey may
be drawn large general deductions on which reasonable expectations may
be founded. No one denies that the experience of the past may teach
lessons of political wisdom for the guidance of the future. If it were
not so, history w
|