FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   >>   >|  
ey may have been at least equally important for the history of Buddhism.] [Footnote 525: _E.g._ see the Maitreya inscription of Turfan.] [Footnote 526: Or at least is not accessible to me here in Hongkong, 1914.] [Footnote 527: I do not mean to say that all Dharanis are late.] [Footnote 528: It is even probable that apocryphal Sutras were composed in Central Asia. See Pelliot in _Melanges d'Indianisme_, Sylvain Levi, p. 329.] [Footnote 529: The list of manifestations in Jambudvipa enumerates 56 kingdoms. All cannot be identified with certainty, but apparently less than half are within India proper.] [Footnote 530: See _Bibl. Budd._ XII. pp. 44, 46, XIV. p. 45.] [Footnote 531: The Turkish sutras repeatedly style the Buddha God (t'angri) or God of Gods. The expression devatideva is applied to him in Sanskrit, but the Turkish phrases are more decided and frequent. The Sanskrit phrase may even be due to Iranian influence.] [Footnote 532: An Chou, the Prince to whose memory the temple was dedicated, seems to be regarded as a manifestation of Maitreya.] [Footnote 533: _J.A._ 1913, I. p. 154. The series of three articles by Chavannes and Pelliot entitled "Un traite Manicheen retrouve en Chine" (_J.A._ 1911, 1913) is a most valuable contribution to our knowledge of Manichaeism in Central Asia and China.] [Footnote 534: _E.g._ see _J.A._ 1911, pp. 509 and 589. See also Le Coq, _Sitzb. preuss. Akad. der Wiss._ 48, 1909, 1202-1218.] [Footnote 535: _J.A._ 1913, I. pp. 116 and 132.] [Footnote 536: See especially Havret, "La stele chretienne de Si-ngan-fu" in _Varietes Sinologues_, pp. 7, 12 and 20.] [Footnote 537: See Havret, _l. c_. III. p. 54, for some interesting remarks respecting the unwillingness of the Nestorians and also of the Jesuits to give publicity to the crucifixion.] [Footnote 538: See Takakusu, _I-tsing_, pp. 169, 223, and _T'oung Pao_, 1896, p. 589.] [Footnote 539: Turfan and Kucha are spoken of as being mainly Hinayanist.] [Footnote 540: See Stein, _Zoroastrian deities on Indo-Scythian coins_, 1887.] [Footnote 541: See _S.B.E._ IV. (Vendidad) pp. 145, 209; XXIII. p. 184, V. p. III.] [Footnote 542: Chap. VII. The notices in Chaps. XXII. and XXIV. are rather more detailed but also later.] [Footnote 543: XII. p. 23.] [Footnote 544: Transl. Schiefner, pp. 93, 105 and 303, and Pander's _Pantheon_, No. 11. But Taranatha also says that he was Aryadeva's pupil.] [Footnote 5
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Havret

 
Pelliot
 

Central

 
Turkish
 

Sanskrit

 

Maitreya

 
Turfan
 

respecting

 

publicity


crucifixion

 

Takakusu

 

Jesuits

 
remarks
 

unwillingness

 

Nestorians

 
interesting
 

Varietes

 

preuss

 

Sinologues


chretienne
 

detailed

 
Transl
 
notices
 

Schiefner

 
Taranatha
 

Aryadeva

 

Pander

 

Pantheon

 

spoken


Hinayanist

 

Zoroastrian

 

deities

 
Vendidad
 

Scythian

 

entitled

 

Jambudvipa

 

manifestations

 

enumerates

 

kingdoms


Indianisme

 

Sylvain

 
identified
 

proper

 

certainty

 

apparently

 

Melanges

 

equally

 

history

 
Hongkong