FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347  
348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   >>   >|  
"which ought not to be given a place in matters of religion. _Disputas ex philosophia, cui locus in rebus religionis esse non debet._" Again, at Weimar: "It is against the nature of inquiring truth to insist on arguing from blind philosophy. What else corrupted such ancient theologians as Clement, Origen, Chrysostom, and afterwards also the Sophists [scholastic theologians] but that they endeavored to decide spiritual things by philosophy, which does not understand the secret and hidden mysteries of God. _Est contra naturam inquirendae veritatis, si velimus ex caeca philosophia loqui. Quid aliud corrupit theologos veteres, ut Clementem, Originem, Chrysosthomum et postea etiam Sophistas, nisi quod de rebus divinis ex philosophia voluerunt statuere, quae non intelligit abstrusissima et occultissima mysteria Dei._" "May we therefore observe the rule of Luther: Let the woman be silent in the Church! For what a miserable thing would it be if we had to judge ecclesiastical matters from logic! _Itaque observemus legem Lutheri: Taceat mulier in ecclesia! Quae enim miseria, si ex dialectica diiudicandae nobis essent res ecclesiae!_" (Planck 4, 709.) In an antisynergistic confession published by Schluesselburg, we read: "This doctrine [of conversion by God's grace alone] is simple, clear, certain, and irrefutable if one looks to God's Word alone and derives the _Nosce teipsum,_ Know thyself, from the wisdom of God. But since poor men are blind, they love their darkness more than the light, as Christ says John 3, and insist on criticizing and falsifying God's truth by means of blind philosophy, which, forsooth, is a shame and a palpable sin, if we but had eyes to see and know.... Whatsoever blind reason produces in such articles of faith against the Word of God is false and wrong. For it is said: _Mulier in ecclesia taceat!_ Let philosophy and human wisdom be silent in the Church." (_Catalogus_ 5, 665f.) Here, too, the sophistical objections of the Synergists are disposed of with such remarks as: "In the first place, this is but spun from reason, which thus acts wise in these matters. _Denn fuers erste ist solches nur aus der Vernunft gesponnen, die weiss also hierin zu kluegeln._" (668.) "This is all spun from reason; but God's Word teaches us better. _Dies ist alles aus der Vernunft spintisiert; Gottes Wort aber lehrt es besser._" (670.) Evidently Strigel's rationalistic method was identical with that employed by Melanchthon
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347  
348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

philosophy

 
philosophia
 
reason
 

matters

 
Vernunft
 
wisdom
 

Church

 

silent

 

ecclesia

 

theologians


insist

 

Whatsoever

 
palpable
 

forsooth

 
taceat
 

Catalogus

 

Mulier

 
articles
 

produces

 

criticizing


thyself

 

teipsum

 

irrefutable

 

religionis

 

derives

 
Christ
 

darkness

 

falsifying

 
spintisiert
 

Gottes


kluegeln

 

teaches

 

method

 

identical

 
employed
 

Melanchthon

 

rationalistic

 

Strigel

 

besser

 
Evidently

hierin
 
remarks
 

religion

 

Disputas

 

disposed

 

sophistical

 

objections

 

Synergists

 
gesponnen
 

solches