FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346  
347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   >>   >|  
y philosophical reasoning, indirect arguing, and alleged necessary logical consequences. At Weimar and in his _Confession_ of December 5 1560, delivered to the Duke soon after the disputation, Strigel argued: Whoever denies that man, in a way and measure, is able to cooperate in his own conversion is logically compelled also to deny that the rejection of grace may be imputed to man, compelled to make God responsible for man's damnation; to surrender the universality of God's grace and call; to admit contradictory wills in God, and to take recourse to an absolute decree of election and reprobation in order to account for the fact that some reject the grace of God and are lost while others are converted and saved. At Weimar Strigel declared: "I do not say that the will is able to assent to the Word without the Holy Spirit, but that, being moved and assisted by the Spirit, it assents with trepidation. If we were unable to do this, we would not be responsible for not having received the Word. _Si hoc [utcumque assentiri inter trepidationes] non possemus, non essemus rei propter Verbum non receptum._" Again, also at Weimar: "If the will is not able to assent in some way, even when assisted, then we cannot be responsible for rejecting the Word, but the blame must be transferred to another, and others may judge how religious that is. _Si voluntas ne quidem adiuta potest aliquo modo annuere, non possumus esse rei propter Verbum reiectum, sed culpa est in alium transferenda quod quam sit religio sum, alii iudicent._" (Planck 4, 689. 719; Luthardt, _Lehre vom freien Willen,_ 222.) Over against this rationalistic method of Strigel and the Synergists generally, the Lutherans adhered to the principle that nothing but a clear passage of the Bible can decide a theological question. They rejected as false philosophy and rationalism every argument directed against the clear sense of a clear Word of God. They emphatically objected to the employment of reason for establishing a Christian doctrine or subverting a statement of the Bible. At Weimar, Flacius protested again and again that human reason is not an authority in theological matters. "Let us hear the Scriptures! _Audiamus Scripturam!_" "Let the woman be silent in the Church! _Mulier taceat in ecclesia!_" With such slogans he brushed aside the alleged necessary logical inferences and deductions of Strigel. "You take your arguments from philosophy," he said in the second session,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346  
347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Strigel

 
Weimar
 
responsible
 

reason

 
philosophy
 
theological
 

Verbum

 

assisted

 

Spirit

 

assent


propter

 

alleged

 
compelled
 

logical

 
adhered
 

Synergists

 

method

 
generally
 

Lutherans

 

consequences


principle

 

arguing

 

rationalism

 

rejected

 

rationalistic

 
decide
 

question

 

passage

 
religio
 

transferenda


iudicent

 

Planck

 

freien

 

Willen

 
argument
 

Luthardt

 

emphatically

 

slogans

 

ecclesia

 
taceat

silent
 
Church
 

Mulier

 

brushed

 

session

 

arguments

 

inferences

 

deductions

 
Scripturam
 

Audiamus