FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270  
271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   >>   >|  
ed, if they be found to contradict the truth. Believe me, a self-renunciation which has something lofty in it, and of which the world never hears, is often enacted in the private experience of the true votary of science. And if a man be not capable of this self-renunciation--this loyal surrender of himself to Nature and to fact, he lacks, in my opinion, the first mark of a true philosopher. Thus the earnest prosecutor of science, who does not work with the idea of producing a sensation in the world, who loves the truth better than the transitory blaze of to-day's fame, who comes to his task with a single eye, finds in that task an indirect means of the highest moral culture. And although the virtue of the act depends upon its privacy, this sacrifice of self, this upright determination to accept the truth, no matter how it may present itself--even at the hands of a scientific foe, if necessary--carries with it its own reward. When prejudice is put under foot and the stains of personal bias have been washed away--when a man consents to lay aside his vanity and to become Nature's organ--his elevation is the instant consequence of his humility. I should not wonder if my remarks provoked a smile, for they seem to indicate that I regard the man of science as a heroic, if not indeed an angelic, character; and cases may occur to you which indicate the reverse. You may point to the quarrels of scientific men, to their struggles for priority, to that unpleasant egotism which screams around its little property of discovery like a scared plover about its young. I will not deny all this; but let it be set down to its proper account, to the weakness--or, if you will--to the selfishness of Man, but not to the charge of Physical Science. The second process in physical investigation is _deduction_, or the advance of the mind from fixed principles to the conclusions which flow from them. The rules of logic are the formal statement of this process, which, however, was practised by every healthy mind before ever such rules were written. In the study of Physics, induction and deduction are perpetually wedded to each other. The man observes, strips facts of their peculiarities of form, and tries to unite them by their essences; having effected this, he at once deduces, and thus checks his induction. Here the grand difference between the methods at present followed, and those of the ancients, becomes manifest. They were one-s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270  
271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

science

 

induction

 
present
 

scientific

 

deduction

 
process
 
renunciation
 
Nature
 

Science

 

Physical


ancients
 

methods

 

charge

 
selfishness
 
weakness
 
account
 
proper
 

discovery

 

quarrels

 
manifest

reverse

 

struggles

 

property

 

scared

 

screams

 
priority
 

unpleasant

 

egotism

 

plover

 

written


essences

 

character

 
healthy
 

Physics

 

observes

 

strips

 

perpetually

 
wedded
 

practised

 

advance


checks

 

investigation

 

difference

 

peculiarities

 

physical

 
principles
 
conclusions
 

statement

 

effected

 

formal