atea, Milton's Penseroso,
Alexander's Feast, etc., where he could revel and plunge and frolic
without being tied down to Orthodoxy. And these are (to my mind) his
really great works: these, and his Coronation Anthems, where Human Pomp
is to be accompanied and illustrated
Now for Tauchnitz; somehow, that which you sent me is not the thing: I
don't like it half so well as my little Tauchnitz stereotype Sophocles of
1827. The Euripides you send bears date 1846: and is certainly not so
clear to my eyes as 1827. Never mind: don't trouble yourself further: I
shall light upon what I want one of these Days. It is wonderful how _The
Sea_ brought up this Appetite for Greek: it likes to be called [Greek
text] and [Greek text] better than the wretched word '_Sea_,' I am sure:
and the Greeks (especially AEschylus--after Homer) are full of Seafaring
Sounds and Allusions. I think the Murmur of the AEgean (if that is their
Sea) wrought itself into their Language. How is it the Islandic (which I
read is our Mother Tongue) was not more Poluphloisboi-ic?
Sophocles has almost shaken my Allegiance to AEschylus. Oh, those two
OEdipuses! but then that Agamemnon! Well: one shall be the Handel and
'tother the Haydn; one the Michel Angelo, and 'tother the Raffaelle, of
Tragedy. As to the famous Prometheus, I think, as I always thought, it
is somewhat over-rated for Sublimity; I can't see much in the far famed
Conception of the Hero's Character: and I doubt (_rest wanting_).
_To S. Laurence_.
MARKET HILL: WOODBRIDGE.
_Jan._ 7/64.
DEAR LAURENCE,
. . . I want to know about your two Portraits of Thackeray: the first one
(which I think Smith and Elder have) I know by the Print: I want to know
about one you last did (some two years ago?) whether you think it as good
and characteristic: and also who has it. Frederic Tennyson sent me a
Photograph of W. M. T. old, white, massive, and melancholy, sitting in
his Library.
I am surprized almost to find how much I am thinking of him: so little as
I had seen him for the last ten years; not once for the last five. I had
been told--by you, for one--that he was spoiled. I am glad therefore
that I have scarce seen him since he was 'old Thackeray.' I keep reading
his Newcomes of nights, and as it were hear him saying so much in it; and
it seems to me as if he might be coming up my Stairs, and about to come
(singing) into my Room, as in old Charlotte Street, etc., thirty years
ago. {50}
|