FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231  
232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   >>   >|  
ollo and the Sibyl. [412] Marquardt, p. 266; Mommsen, _Staatsrecht_, i.^2 594 foll. The ceremony is best described by Ovid, _Ex Ponto_, iv. 9. 5 foll. He is addressing the consul of the year from his place of exile: at cum Tarpeias esses deductus in arces, dum caderet iussu victima sacra tuo, me quoque secreto grates sibi magnus agentem audisset media qui sedet aede deus. (II. 28 foll.) [413] Valerius Maximus iv. 1. 10. [414] A list of these is given in Aust, _De aedibus sacris populi Romani_ (Marpurg, 1889). A valuable work, which will be of service to us later on. [415] Livy xxxvi. 2. 3. [416] _Ib._ xxii. 10. [417] _Ib._ sec. 6. The meaning is that if any one has stolen an animal which was intended to be dedicated, no blame attaches to the person so robbed; and that if a man performs his dedication on a day of ill omen unwittingly, it will hold good none the less. [418] Farnell, _Evolution of Religion_, p. 195. [419] The fact that words like _reus_ and _damnatus_ were applied respectively to persons who had made a vow and to those who had performed it, _i.e._ as being liable like a defendant, and then released from that position by a verdict or sentence (see Wissowa, _R.K._ p. 320), is of course significant of the idea of the transaction in the mind of the Roman, who, as Macrobius says (iii. 2. 6) _se numinibus obligat_, as an accused person is _obligatus_ to the authorities of the State (Mommsen, _Strafrecht_, 189 foll.). It is the natural tendency of the Roman mind to give all transactions a legal sanction; but it does not thence follow that the original idea was really thought of as a contract, and we have only to reflect that the final act was a thank-offering to see the difference between the civil and the religious process. [420] Livy v. 21. [421] Macr. iii. 9, 6. He says that he found it in the fifth book of _Res reconditae_ by one Sammonicus Serenus, and that the latter had himself found it "in cuiusdam Furii vetustissimo libro." [422] On this subject see article "Devotio" in Pauly-Wissowa. [423] Livy viii. 10, "licere consuli dictatori praetori...." Cp. Cic. _de Nat. deorum_, ii. 10, "at vero apud maiores tanta religionis vis fuit, ut quidam
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231  
232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Mommsen
 

person

 

Wissowa

 

tendency

 

follow

 

natural

 

sanction

 

transactions

 

transaction

 
verdict

position

 

sentence

 

released

 

performed

 

liable

 

defendant

 

obligatus

 
accused
 
authorities
 
Strafrecht

obligat

 

numinibus

 

significant

 

Macrobius

 

licere

 

dictatori

 

consuli

 

Devotio

 
article
 

vetustissimo


subject
 
praetori
 

religionis

 
quidam
 
maiores
 
deorum
 

cuiusdam

 

offering

 
difference
 
reflect

thought
 

contract

 

religious

 
process
 
reconditae
 

Sammonicus

 

Serenus

 

original

 

agentem

 

magnus