FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275  
276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   >>   >|  
ab alto"). [528] This was in a _contio_: "Cum Gracchus deos inciperet precari." See above, Lecture VII. note 13. [529] See _R.F._ p. 74 foll.; Wissowa, _R.K._ p. 243. For the relation of the pomoerium to the wall, see above, p. 94. [530] The process is amusingly explained by Carter in _The Religion of Numa_, p. 72 foll. [531] _R.F._ p. 75. [532] See Aust, _De aedibus sacris P.R._, passim. [533] Lately this has been denied by Pais, _Storia di Roma_, i. 339. [534] Pliny, _N.H._ 35, 154. [535] I owe the information to my friend Prof. Percy Gardner. [536] See Carter, _op. cit._ p. 66; but I am not sure that his reasons are conclusive. [537] Diels, _Sibyllinische Blaetter_, p. 6 foll., and cp. 79. [538] It should be noted that the cult of Apollo in Rome was older than the introduction of Sibylline influence; so at least it is generally assumed. Wissowa, however (_R.K._ p. 239), puts it as "gleichzeitig." The date of the Apollinar in pratis Flaminiis, the oldest Apolline fanum in Rome (outside pomoerium), is unknown; that of the temple on the same site was 431 (Livy iv. 25 and 29). There is little doubt that the Apollo-cult spread from Cumae northwards, and was by this time well established in Italy. (The foundation of the temple of 431, consisting of opus quadratum, still in part survives: Huelsen-Jordan, _Rom. Topographie_, iii. 535). [539] Heracleitus, _fragm._ xii., ed. Bywater. [540] _Phaedrus_, p. 244. [541] So Korte in Pauly-Wissowa, _Real-Encycl._, _s.v._ "Etrusker." [542] The present tendency is to take the plebs as representing an older population of Latium before the arrival of the patricians; see, _e.g._, Binder, _Die Plebs_, p. 358 foll. But the plebs of later days is not to be explained on one hypothesis only. [543] _e.g._ in religious matters the _duoviri aedi dedicandae_; Mommsen, _Staatsrecht_, ii. 601 foll. [544] Carter, _Religion of Numa_, p. 77 foll. It is uncertain whether there was a Roman Mercurius of earlier origin, or whether the name Mercurius (_i.e._ concerned in trade) was a new invention to avoid using the Greek name, as in the case of the trias Ceres, Liber, Libera. [545] Carter, _op. cit._ 81. The connection of this Poseidon-Neptunus and Hermes-Mercurius is con
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275  
276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Carter
 

Mercurius

 

Wissowa

 

Religion

 

explained

 

Apollo

 

pomoerium

 

temple

 

consisting

 
foundation

established

 

present

 

Encycl

 

Etrusker

 

Topographie

 

Jordan

 

spread

 
survives
 
tendency
 
Heracleitus

quadratum

 

Huelsen

 

northwards

 

Phaedrus

 

Bywater

 

concerned

 

invention

 

origin

 
uncertain
 

earlier


Poseidon
 
connection
 

Neptunus

 
Hermes
 
Libera
 
Binder
 

patricians

 

arrival

 
representing
 
population

Latium
 

dedicandae

 

Mommsen

 
Staatsrecht
 
duoviri
 

matters

 

hypothesis

 

religious

 

passim

 

Lately