FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314  
315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   >>   >|  
s procedure to support his theory that the origin of such institutions is to be found in the period of migration. [632] That the division of the _templum_ into _regiones_ was necessary only for the _auguria caelestia_, and not for the observation of birds, is the conclusion drawn by Wissowa (_R.K._ 457, note 2) from the words of Cicero (_de Legibus_, ii. 21) in his _ius divinum_: "caelique fulgura regionibus ratis temperanto" (_i.e._ the magistrates). [633] Cicero expressly says that even old Cato complained of the neglect of the auspicia by the college: _de Div._ i. 15. 28; above, in sec. 25, he had said the same thing of the augurs of his own day, _i.e._ including himself. We know of a work on the _auspicia_ by M. Messalla, an augur, from which Gellius, xiii. 15, quotes a lengthy extract (cp. ch. 14). This man was consul in 53 B.C.; Schanz, _Gesch. der roem. Lit._, ii. 492. Just at the same time Appius Claudius, Cicero's predecessor as governor of Cilicia, wrote _libri augurales_, to which Cicero more than once alludes in his correspondence with Appius: _ad Fam._ iii. 9. 3 and 11. 4. It is plain that the old augural lore is now treated only as a curiosity, of which the secrecy need no longer be respected. [634] P. Regell, _De augurum publicorum libris_, whose excellent little work has never been superseded, thinks (p. 19) that the _libri_ were the result of the neglect of the art, _i.e._ that it was necessary to put it in writing, because otherwise it would be forgotten. "Tota eius vita," he says, "lenta est mors." The lore was complete about the time of the decemvirate, but _decreta_ must have been continually added (p. 23). The nucleus may be represented in Cicero, _de Legibus_, ii. 20. 21, and perhaps existed in Saturnian verse (Festus, 290). The additions in the way of decree or comment would probably range over the fourth and third centuries B.C. like those of the pontifices. No doubt the Hannibalic war had the effect of diminishing the importance of the lore, as the next lecture should show. On the whole we may put the great period of the college between the decemvirate and the war with Hannibal. [635] This is the opinion of Bouche-Leclercq, _op. cit._ vol. iv. p. 205 foll.; cp. Wissowa, _R.K._ p. 457. Cicero calls the augur
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314  
315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cicero

 

Appius

 

Legibus

 

neglect

 
auspicia
 

college

 

period

 

decemvirate

 
Wissowa
 

complete


decreta
 
longer
 

publicorum

 

thinks

 

augurum

 

superseded

 

libris

 

result

 

forgotten

 

respected


excellent
 

Regell

 

writing

 

decree

 

lecture

 

effect

 
Hannibalic
 
diminishing
 

importance

 
Hannibal

opinion

 

Bouche

 
Leclercq
 

Saturnian

 

Festus

 
additions
 
existed
 

nucleus

 

represented

 

centuries


pontifices

 

fourth

 

comment

 
continually
 

governor

 
magistrates
 

expressly

 

temperanto

 

divinum

 
caelique