FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279  
280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   >>   >|  
ered in its use. All are agreed that a general attack of cavalry against a line in good order cannot be attempted with much hope of success, unless it be supported by infantry and artillery. At Waterloo the French paid dearly for having violated this rule; and the cavalry of Frederick the Great fared no better at Kunnersdorf. A commander may sometimes feel obliged to push his cavalry forward alone, but generally the best time for charging a line of infantry is when it is already engaged with opposing infantry. The battles of Marengo, Eylau, Borodino, and several others prove this. There is one case in which cavalry has a very decided superiority over infantry,--when rain or snow dampens the arms of the latter and they cannot fire. Augereau's corps found this out, to their sorrow, at Eylau, and so did the Austrian left at Dresden. Infantry that has been shaken by a fire of artillery or in any other way may be charged with success. A very remarkable charge of this kind was made by the Prussian cavalry at Hohenfriedberg in 1745. A charge against squares of good infantry in good order cannot succeed. A general cavalry charge is made to carry batteries of artillery and enable the infantry to take the position more easily; but the infantry must then be at hand to sustain the cavalry, for a charge of this character has only a momentary effect, which must be taken advantage of before the enemy can return offensively upon the broken cavalry. The beautiful charge of the French upon Gosa at the battle of Leipsic, October 16, is a fine example of this kind. Those executed at Waterloo with the same object in view were admirable, but failed because unsupported. The daring charge of Ney's weak cavalry upon Prince Hohenlohe's artillery at Jena is an example of what may be done under such circumstances. General charges are also made against the enemy's cavalry, to drive it from the field of battle and return more free to act against his infantry. Cavalry may be successfully thrown against the flank or rear of an enemy's line at the moment of its being attacked in front by the infantry. If repulsed, it may rally upon the army at a gallop, and, if successful, it may cause the loss of the enemy's army. This operation is rarely attempted, but I see no reason why it should not be very good; for a body of cavalry well handled cannot be cut off even if it gets in rear of the enemy. This is a duty for which light cavalry is parti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279  
280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

cavalry

 

infantry

 

charge

 
artillery
 
return
 

battle

 
general
 

French

 

Waterloo

 

success


attempted
 

object

 

executed

 

Prince

 

Hohenlohe

 
daring
 

admirable

 

failed

 

unsupported

 
October

advantage

 
momentary
 

effect

 

offensively

 

Leipsic

 

broken

 

beautiful

 
repulsed
 

attacked

 

moment


reason

 

operation

 

successful

 

rarely

 

gallop

 

General

 

charges

 

handled

 

circumstances

 

Cavalry


successfully

 

thrown

 

generally

 

charging

 

forward

 

obliged

 
engaged
 

Borodino

 

opposing

 

battles