FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94  
95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>   >|  
nd are so intimately allied, that they are frequently confounded, although they are decidedly distinct. Such are _fronts of operations, strategic fronts, lines of defense_, and _strategic positions_. It is proposed in this article to show the distinction between them and to expose their relations to each other. FRONTS OF OPERATIONS AND STRATEGIC FRONTS. When the masses of an army are posted in a zone of operations, they generally occupy strategic positions. The extent of the front occupied toward the enemy is called the _strategic front_. The portion of the theater of war from which an enemy can probably reach this front in two or three marches is called the _front of operations_. The resemblance between these two fronts has caused many military men to confound them, sometimes under one name and sometimes under the other. Rigorously speaking, however, the strategic front designates that formed by the actual positions occupied by the masses of the army, while the other embraces the space separating the two armies, and extends one or two marches beyond each extremity of the strategic front, and includes the ground upon which the armies will probably come in collision. When the operations of a campaign are on the eve of commencing, one of the armies will decide to await the attack of the other, and will undertake to prepare a line of defense, which may be either that of the strategic front or more to the rear. Hence the strategic front and line of defense may coincide, as was the case in 1795 and 1796 upon the Rhine, which was then a line of defense for both Austrians and French, and at the same time their strategic front and front of operations. This occasional coincidence of these lines doubtless leads persons to confound them, while they are really very different. An army has not necessarily a line of defense, as, for example, when it invades: when its masses are concentrated in a single position, it has no strategic front, but it is never without a front of operations. The two following examples will illustrate the difference between the different terms. At the resumption of hostilities in 1813, Napoleon's front of operations extended at first from Hamburg to Wittenberg; thence it ran along the line of the allies toward Glogau and Breslau, (his right being at Loewenberg,) and followed along the frontier of Bohemia to Dresden. His forces were stationed on this grand front in four masses, whose strategic
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94  
95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

strategic

 

operations

 

defense

 
masses
 
armies
 

positions

 
fronts
 

confound

 

occupied

 

marches


called
 

FRONTS

 

Austrians

 

French

 

single

 
invades
 

concentrated

 

occasional

 

position

 
persons

necessarily

 
doubtless
 

coincidence

 

Loewenberg

 

allies

 

Glogau

 

Breslau

 
frontier
 

Bohemia

 

stationed


Dresden

 

forces

 

illustrate

 

difference

 

examples

 

resumption

 

Hamburg

 

Wittenberg

 

extended

 

hostilities


Napoleon

 

generally

 

occupy

 

posted

 

STRATEGIC

 

OPERATIONS

 
extent
 

portion

 

resemblance

 

caused