FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127  
128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   >>   >|  
d to the attacks of an enemy superior in force. His object was to gain communication with Napoleon, whose intention was to join him by Herzberg or Luckau; but Ney should from the beginning have taken all logistic and tactical means of accomplishing this change of strategic line and of informing his army of it. He did nothing of this kind,--either from forgetfulness, or on account of the feeling of aversion he had to any thing like a retreat,--and the severe losses at Dennewitz were the result. Napoleon in 1796 gave one of the best illustrations of these different combinations of strategic lines. His general line of operations extended from the Apennines to Verona. When he had driven Wurmser upon Roveredo and determined to pursue him into the Tyrol, he pushed on in the valley of the Adige to Trent and the Lavis, where he learned that Wurmser had moved by the Brenta on the Frioul, doubtless to take him in reverse. There were but three courses open to him,--to remain in the narrow valley of the Adige at great risk, to retreat by Verona to meet Wurmser, or the last,--which was sublime, but rash,--to follow him into the valley of the Brenta, which was encircled by rugged mountains whose two passages might be held by the Austrians. Napoleon was not the man to hesitate between three such alternatives. He left Vaubois on the Lavis to cover Trent, and marched with the remainder of his forces on Bassano. The brilliant results of this bold step are well known. The route from Trent to Bassano was not the line of operations of the army, but a _strategic line of maneuver_ still bolder than that of Bluecher on Wavre. However, it was an operation of only three or four days' duration, at the end of which time Napoleon would either beat or be beaten at Bassano: in the first case, he would open direct communication with Verona and his line of operations; in the second, he could regain in great haste Trent, where, reinforced by Vaubois, he could fall back either upon Verona or Peschiera. The difficulties of the country, which made this march audacious in one respect, were favorable in another; for even if Wurmser had been victorious at Bassano he could not have interfered with the return to Trent, as there was no road to enable him to anticipate Napoleon. If Davidovitch on the Lavis had driven Vaubois from Trent, he might have embarrassed Napoleon; but this Austrian general, previously beaten at Roveredo, and ignorant of what the French a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127  
128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Napoleon

 

Bassano

 

Verona

 
Wurmser
 
strategic
 

valley

 
operations
 

Vaubois

 

beaten

 

retreat


Brenta
 

general

 

Roveredo

 

communication

 

driven

 
operation
 

However

 

maneuver

 

results

 
brilliant

marched

 
remainder
 

forces

 

alternatives

 

Bluecher

 

bolder

 

return

 
interfered
 

victorious

 

enable


previously

 

ignorant

 

French

 

Austrian

 

embarrassed

 

anticipate

 

Davidovitch

 

favorable

 

direct

 

regain


duration

 

reinforced

 

audacious

 

respect

 

country

 

difficulties

 
Peschiera
 

Frioul

 

forgetfulness

 

account