FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247  
1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   >>   >|  
signed, not to impose unequal or unnecessary restrictions upon anyone, but to promote, with as little individual inconvenience as possible, the general good. Though, in many respects, necessarily special in their character they do not furnish just ground of complaint if they operate alike upon all persons and property under the same circumstances and conditions."[1028] The due process and equal protection clauses overlap but the spheres of protection they offer are not coterminous. The due process clause "tends to secure equality of law in the sense that it makes a required minimum of protection for everyone's right of life, liberty, and property, which the Congress or the legislature may not withhold. * * * The guaranty [of equal protection] was aimed at undue favor and individual or class privilege, on the other hand, and at hostile discrimination or the oppression of inequality, on the other."[1029] Legislative Classifications Although the equal protection clause requires laws of like application to all similarly situated, the legislature is allowed wide discretion in the selection of classes.[1030] Classification will not render a State police statute unconstitutional so long as it has a reasonable basis;[1031] its validity does not depend on scientific or marked differences in things or persons or in their relations. It suffices if it is practical.[1032] While a State legislature may not arbitrarily select certain individuals for the operation of its statutes, a selection is obnoxious to the equal protection clause only if it is clearly and actually arbitrary and not merely possibly so.[1033] A substantial difference, in point of harmful results, between two methods of operation, justifies a classification and the burden is on the attacking party to prove it unreasonable.[1034] There is a strong presumption that discriminations in State legislation are based on adequate grounds.[1035] Every state of facts sufficient to sustain a classification which can reasonably be conceived of as having existed when the law was adopted will be assumed.[1036] There is no doctrinaire requirement that legislation should be couched in all-embracing terms.[1037] A police statute may be confined to the occasion for its existence.[1038] The equal protection clause does not mean that all occupations that are called by the same name must be treated in the same way.[1039] The legislature is free to recognize degrees of harm; a la
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   1246   1247  
1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
protection
 
legislature
 
clause
 

selection

 
classification
 

legislation

 
property
 
individual
 

process

 

police


operation

 
statute
 

persons

 

justifies

 

arbitrarily

 
select
 

burden

 

attacking

 

relations

 

suffices


methods

 

practical

 

harmful

 

arbitrary

 

unreasonable

 

statutes

 

obnoxious

 

possibly

 
results
 
difference

individuals

 
substantial
 

adequate

 

treated

 

couched

 

embracing

 

requirement

 

doctrinaire

 

assumed

 

called


occupations

 
confined
 

occasion

 

existence

 

adopted

 
degrees
 
recognize
 

grounds

 

strong

 
presumption