8 (1949).
[182] Ibid. 90.
[183] Brinegar _v._ United States, 338 U.S. 160, 180 (1949).
[184] Terminiello _v._ Chicago, 337 U.S. 1, 4 (1949).
[185] Kunz _v._ New York, 340 U.S. 290, 302.
[186] Ibid. 309. In a footnote Justice Jackson points to the peculiarly
protected position of the Court today, thanks to ch. 479, Public Law
250, 81st Congress, approved August 18, 1949. This makes it unlawful to
"make any harangue or oration, or utter loud, threatening, or abusive
language in the Supreme Court Building or grounds." Sec. 5. It also
forbids display of any "flag, banner, or device designed or adapted to
bring into public notice any party, organization, or movement." Sec. 6.
Moreover, it authorizes the marshal to "prescribe such regulations
approved by the Chief Justice of the United States, as may be deemed
necessary for the adequate protection of the Supreme Court Building and
grounds and of persons and property therein, and for the maintenance
of suitable grounds." Sec. 7. Violation of these provisions or
regulations is an offense punishable by fine and imprisonment.
[187] Grosjean _v._ American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 246 (1936).
[188] Ibid. 250.
[189] Ibid.
[190] Murdock _v._ Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943); Jones _v._
Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943); Follett _v._ McCormick, 321 U.S. 573
(1944).
[191] Associated Press _v._ United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945). A
newspaper publisher who enjoyed a substantial monopoly of mass
distribution of news was enjoined from refusing advertising from persons
advertising over a competing radio station. The Court sustained the
injunction against the objection that it violated freedom of the press,
holding that appellant was guilty of attempting to monopolize interstate
commerce. Lorain Journal _v._ United States, 342 U.S. 143 (1951).
[192] Associated Press _v._ Labor Board, 301 U.S. 103, 133 (1937).
[193] Okla. Press Pub. Co. _v._ Walling, 327 U.S. 186 (1946).
[194] 221 U.S. 418 (1911).
[195] Ibid. 430.
[196] 314 U.S. 469 (1941).
[197] Ibid: 477.
[198] Ibid. 478.
[199] United States _v._ C.I.O., 335 U.S. 106 (1948).
[200] 106 U.S. 371 (1882).
[201] 19 Stat. 143 Sec. 6 (1876).
[202] 53 Stat. 1147 (1939).
[203] United Public Workers _v._ Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75 (1947).
[204] Oklahoma _v._ United States Civil Serv. Comm., 330 U.S. 127
(1947).
[205] Schenck _v._ United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919); Frohwerk _v._
United States, 249 U.S. 204
|