FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970  
971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   >>   >|  
8 (1949). [182] Ibid. 90. [183] Brinegar _v._ United States, 338 U.S. 160, 180 (1949). [184] Terminiello _v._ Chicago, 337 U.S. 1, 4 (1949). [185] Kunz _v._ New York, 340 U.S. 290, 302. [186] Ibid. 309. In a footnote Justice Jackson points to the peculiarly protected position of the Court today, thanks to ch. 479, Public Law 250, 81st Congress, approved August 18, 1949. This makes it unlawful to "make any harangue or oration, or utter loud, threatening, or abusive language in the Supreme Court Building or grounds." Sec. 5. It also forbids display of any "flag, banner, or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice any party, organization, or movement." Sec. 6. Moreover, it authorizes the marshal to "prescribe such regulations approved by the Chief Justice of the United States, as may be deemed necessary for the adequate protection of the Supreme Court Building and grounds and of persons and property therein, and for the maintenance of suitable grounds." Sec. 7. Violation of these provisions or regulations is an offense punishable by fine and imprisonment. [187] Grosjean _v._ American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 246 (1936). [188] Ibid. 250. [189] Ibid. [190] Murdock _v._ Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943); Jones _v._ Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943); Follett _v._ McCormick, 321 U.S. 573 (1944). [191] Associated Press _v._ United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945). A newspaper publisher who enjoyed a substantial monopoly of mass distribution of news was enjoined from refusing advertising from persons advertising over a competing radio station. The Court sustained the injunction against the objection that it violated freedom of the press, holding that appellant was guilty of attempting to monopolize interstate commerce. Lorain Journal _v._ United States, 342 U.S. 143 (1951). [192] Associated Press _v._ Labor Board, 301 U.S. 103, 133 (1937). [193] Okla. Press Pub. Co. _v._ Walling, 327 U.S. 186 (1946). [194] 221 U.S. 418 (1911). [195] Ibid. 430. [196] 314 U.S. 469 (1941). [197] Ibid: 477. [198] Ibid. 478. [199] United States _v._ C.I.O., 335 U.S. 106 (1948). [200] 106 U.S. 371 (1882). [201] 19 Stat. 143 Sec. 6 (1876). [202] 53 Stat. 1147 (1939). [203] United Public Workers _v._ Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75 (1947). [204] Oklahoma _v._ United States Civil Serv. Comm., 330 U.S. 127 (1947). [205] Schenck _v._ United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919); Frohwerk _v._ United States, 249 U.S. 204
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970  
971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
United
 
States
 
grounds
 

Supreme

 
Public
 

approved

 
advertising
 
Associated
 

persons

 

regulations


Building

 
Justice
 

sustained

 

injunction

 

station

 
refusing
 

competing

 

Oklahoma

 

objection

 

appellant


guilty

 

holding

 

violated

 

freedom

 

Frohwerk

 

newspaper

 

publisher

 

distribution

 
attempting
 
monopoly

enjoyed

 
substantial
 

Schenck

 

enjoined

 

monopolize

 

McCormick

 

Mitchell

 

Journal

 

interstate

 

commerce


Lorain

 
Workers
 

Walling

 

American

 

August

 
Congress
 
position
 

unlawful

 

forbids

 
language