FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188  
189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   >>   >|  
er many circumstances the Regimental Column can be employed as a practical tactical formation. Thus, if against Infantry or Artillery, it is desirable to attack in many following 'Lines.' The need is at once satisfied if our advance is made in a number of Regimental Columns, wheeled into line to a flank. For a flank attack, if the movement is initiated in a number of Regimental Columns formed to the front and following one another, forming line by a subsequent wheel. In both cases--in the latter after the wheel--one has only to insure that the laterally adjacent squadrons move off together at 'Treffen' (_i.e._, Line) distance to have all one's Lines complete. Such a formation can secure its flanks with the greatest ease by the retention of closed units, or, by bringing up the rearward squadrons, can prolong its front to either flank. In any case it is preferable to the triple column of troops, which makes all influence of the leader impossible, mixes all units in the charge, and hence would best be left out of the Regulations altogether. Nevertheless, practice in the employment of 'Treffen' (_i.e._, 'Lines' as opposed to 'Wings') must not be entirely neglected, as under certain circumstances this form may also become necessary. This tendency to group the available forces by 'Wings' in the larger units from the Brigade upwards must also be extended downwards to the regiment, which represents the fundamental tactical unit of the Cavalry, and those formations for manoeuvre which favour the arrangement of its constituent squadrons one behind the other--formations which, at the same time, are both handier and susceptible of more convenient control--must be constantly practised. That Squadron Columns to the Front hardly meet these demands ideally can scarcely be denied. They are unhandy, render all changes of direction materially more difficult, lose direction and distance very easily, and necessitate complex movements in order to arrange them one behind the other. Already in Brigade formations these drawbacks are apparent, and in larger masses they prove most formidable. The Squadron Column is, in fact, a formation derived exclusively with a view to 'Line' tactics, and for this reason alone they hamper all other demands. There is, however, no compelling reason why they should be retained as the principal working formation for Cavalry, and therefore as fundamentally beyond the reach of criticism. It seems to me that a f
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188  
189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

formation

 

formations

 

Columns

 
squadrons
 

Regimental

 
circumstances
 

tactical

 

Squadron

 

distance

 

Treffen


Brigade

 

larger

 

Column

 

reason

 

number

 
direction
 

Cavalry

 

attack

 
demands
 

upwards


practised

 

scarcely

 

denied

 

ideally

 

extended

 

represents

 

arrangement

 
constituent
 

favour

 

manoeuvre


fundamental
 

unhandy

 
regiment
 

susceptible

 

convenient

 

control

 
handier
 

constantly

 

apparent

 

compelling


retained

 

tactics

 

hamper

 

principal

 
working
 

criticism

 

fundamentally

 
exclusively
 

easily

 

necessitate