FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769  
770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   >>   >|  
e again, Sir, recur to the message of the President. Speaking of the loss of the bill, he uses these words: "This failure was the more regretted, not only because it necessarily interrupted and delayed the progress of a system of national defence projected immediately after the last war, and since steadily pursued, but also because it contained a contingent appropriation, inserted in accordance with the views of the executive, in aid of this important object, and other branches of the national defence, some portions of which might have been most usefully applied during the past season." Taking these words of the message, Sir, and connecting them with the fact that the President had made no recommendation to Congress of any such appropriation, it strikes me that they furnish matter for very grave reflection. The President says that this proposed appropriation was "in accordance with the views of the executive"; that it was "in aid of an important object"; and that "some portions of it might have been most usefully applied during the past season." And now, Sir, I ask, if this be so, why was not this appropriation recommended to Congress by the President? I ask this question in the name of the Constitution of the United States; I stand on its own clear authority in asking it; and I invite all those who remember its injunctions, and who mean to respect them, to consider well how the question is to be answered. Sir, the Constitution is not yet an entire dead letter. There is yet some form of observance of its requirements; and even while any degree of formal respect is paid to it, I must be permitted to continue the question, Why was not this appropriation recommended? It was in accordance with the President's views; it was for an important object; it might have been usefully expended. The President being of opinion, therefore, that the appropriation was necessary and proper, how is it that it was not recommended to Congress? For, Sir, we all know the plain and direct words in which the very first duty of the President is imposed by the Constitution. Here they are:-- "He shall, from time to time, give to the Congress information of the state of the Union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient." After enumerating the _powers_ of the President, this is the first, the very first _duty_ which the Constitution gravely enjoins upon him. And now, Sir, in no language o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769  
770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

President

 

appropriation

 
Constitution
 

Congress

 

accordance

 

important

 

object

 
usefully
 

recommended

 

question


portions

 

message

 

season

 

applied

 
respect
 

executive

 

defence

 

national

 

gravely

 

permitted


enjoins

 

letter

 
entire
 
answered
 
language
 

degree

 
observance
 

requirements

 
formal
 
opinion

recommend
 

consideration

 
measures
 
direct
 

imposed

 

information

 
expended
 
powers
 

proper

 
expedient

enumerating

 

continue

 

immediately

 

system

 

projected

 

steadily

 
contingent
 

inserted

 
contained
 

pursued