FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  
Man might urge against my Conduct, my Tales, and my Language? But alas! my path was chalk'd out for me not by Choice but by Necessity. I had not the Happiness of living in _England_ or a _Tub_. I was the Leader of an ignorant and superstitious People, who would never have heeded the sober Counsels of Good Sense and Toleration, and who would have laughed at the Refinements of a nice Philosophy. It was necessary to flatter their Vanity by telling them that they were the favour'd Children of God, to satisfy their Passions by allowing them to be treacherous and cruel to their Enemies, and to tickle their Ears by Stories and Farces by turns ridiculous and horrible, fit either for a Nursery or _Bedlam_. By such Contrivances I was able to attain my Ends and to establish the Welfare of my Countrymen. Do you blame me? It is not the business of a Ruler to be truthful, but to be politick; he must fly even from Virtue herself, if she sit in a different Quarter from Expediency. It is his Duty to _sacrifice_ the Best, which is impossible, to a _little Good_, which is close at hand. I was willing to lay down a Multitude of foolish Laws, so that, under their Cloak, I might slip in a few Wise ones; and, had I not shown myself to be both Cruel and Superstitious, the _Jews_ would never have escaped from the Bondage of the _Egyptians_. DIOGENES. Perhaps that would not have been an overwhelming Disaster. But, in truth, you are right. There is no viler Profession than the Government of Nations. He who dreams that he can lead a great Crowd of Fools without a great Store of Knavery is a Fool himself. MR. LOKE Are not you too hasty? Does not History show that there have been great Rulers who were good Men? Solon, Henry of _Navarre_, and Milord Somers were certainly not Fools, and yet I am unwilling to believe that they were Knaves either. MOSES No, not Knaves; but Dissemblers. In their different degrees, they all juggled; but 'twas not because Jugglery pleas'd 'em; 'twas because Men cannot be governed without it. MR. LOKE I would be happy to try the Experiment. If Men were told the Truth, might they not believe it? If the Opportunity of Virtue and Wisdom is never to be offer'd 'em, how can we be sure that they would not be willing to take it? Let Rulers be _bold_ and _honest_, and it is possible that the Folly of their Peoples will disappear. DIOGENES A pretty phantastick Vision! But History is against you.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

History

 
Knaves
 

Virtue

 

DIOGENES

 

Rulers

 

Knavery

 
Perhaps
 
overwhelming
 

Disaster

 
Egyptians

Bondage

 

Superstitious

 

escaped

 

Nations

 

dreams

 

Government

 

Profession

 

degrees

 
Wisdom
 

Experiment


Opportunity

 

pretty

 

phantastick

 

Vision

 
disappear
 

honest

 
Peoples
 

Somers

 

Milord

 
Navarre

unwilling

 

Jugglery

 

governed

 

juggled

 

Dissemblers

 

telling

 
Vanity
 

favour

 

Children

 

flatter


laughed

 

Refinements

 

Philosophy

 

satisfy

 
Passions
 
Stories
 

Farces

 

ridiculous

 
tickle
 

allowing