FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409  
410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   >>   >|  
seems much to the purpose, which was told us by a very old man of the Salsette territory in Bacaim, about Josaphat, I think it well to cite it: As I was travelling in the Isle of Salsette, and went to see that rare and admirable Pagoda (which we call the Canara Pagoda[6]) made in a mountain, with many halls cut out of one solid rock ... and enquiring from this old man about the work, and what he thought as to who had made it, he told us that without doubt the work was made by order of the father of St. Josaphat to bring him up therein in seclusion, as the story tells. And as it informs us that he was the son of a great King in India, it may well be, as we have just said, that _he_ was the Budao, of whom they relate such marvels." (Dec. V. liv. vi. cap. 2.) Dominie Valentyn, not being well read in the Golden Legend, remarks on the subject of Buddha: "There be some who hold this Budhum for a fugitive Syrian Jew, or for an Israelite, others who hold him for a Disciple of the Apostle Thomas; but how in that case he could have been born 622 years before Christ I leave them to explain. Diego de Couto stands by the belief that he was certainly _Joshua_, which is still more absurd!" (V. deel, p. 374.) [Since the days of Couto, who considered the Buddhist legend but an imitation of the Christian legend, the identity of the stories was recognised (as mentioned supra) by M. Edouard Laboulaye, in the _Journal des Debats_ of the 26th of July, 1859. About the same time, Professor F. Liebrecht of Liege, in _Ebert's Jahrbuch fuer Romanische und Englische Literatur_, II. p. 314 seqq., comparing the Book of Barlaam and Joasaph with the work of Barthelemy St. Hilaire on Buddha, arrived at the same conclusion. In 1880, Professor T.W. Rhys Davids has devoted some pages (xxxvi.-xli.) in his _Buddhist Birth Stories; or, Jataka Tales_, to _The Barlaam and Josaphat Literature_, and we note from them that: "Pope Sixtus the Fifth (1585-1590) authorised a particular Martyrologium, drawn up by Cardinal Baronius, to be used throughout the Western Church.". In that work are included not only the saints first canonised at Rome, but all those who, having been already canonised elsewhere, were then acknowledged by the Pope and the College of Rites to be saints of the Catholic Church of Christ. Among such, under the date of the 27th of November, are included "The holy Saints Barlaam and Josaphat, of India, on the borders of Persia, whose wonderful a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409  
410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Josaphat

 

Barlaam

 

Church

 
legend
 

included

 

Buddhist

 
Christ
 

Buddha

 

Professor

 
Pagoda

saints

 

canonised

 

Salsette

 

Englische

 

Jahrbuch

 

Literatur

 

Romanische

 

Saints

 

Joasaph

 

Barthelemy


Hilaire

 

November

 

comparing

 

Liebrecht

 

Edouard

 

Laboulaye

 

Journal

 

Persia

 
recognised
 

mentioned


wonderful
 
Debats
 
borders
 

authorised

 

Sixtus

 

stories

 

Martyrologium

 

Western

 

Baronius

 

Cardinal


Literature

 

Davids

 

acknowledged

 

arrived

 

Catholic

 

College

 

conclusion

 

devoted

 

Stories

 
Jataka