FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813  
814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   >>   >|  
anto_ iv, stanza 10. _Quoth_ and _quod_, for _say, saith_, or _said_, are obsolete, or used only in ludicrous language. Webster supposes these words to be equivalent, and each confined to the first and third persons of the present and imperfect tenses of the indicative mood. Johnson says, that, "_quoth you_," as used by Sidney, is irregular; but Tooke assures us, that "The _th_ in _quoth_, does not designate the third person."--_Diversions of Purley_, Vol. ii, p. 323. They are each invariable, and always placed before the nominative: as, _quoth I, quoth he_. "Yea, so sayst thou, (_quod_ Troeylus,) alas!"--_Chaucer_. "I feare, _quod_ he, it wyll not be."--_Sir T. More_. "Stranger, go! Heaven be thy guide! _Quod_ the beadsman of Nith-side."--_Burns_. OBS. 6.--_Methinks_, (i. e., _to_ me _it_ thinks,) for I think, or, it seems to me, with its preterit _methought_, (i. e., _to_ me _it_ thought,) is called by Dr. Johnson an "ungrammatical word." He imagined it to be "a Norman corruption, the French being apt to confound _me_ and _I_."--_Joh. Dict._ It is indeed a puzzling anomaly in our language, though not without some Anglo-Saxon or Latin parallels; and, like its kindred, "me _seemeth_," or "_meseems_," is little worthy to be countenanced, though often used by Dryden, Pope, Addison, and other good writers. Our lexicographers call it an _impersonal verb_, because, being compounded with an objective, it cannot have a nominative expressed. It is nearly equivalent to the adverb _apparently_; and if impersonal, it is also defective; for it has no participles, no "_methinking_," and no participial construction of "_methought_;" though Webster's American Dictionary, whether quarto or octavo, absurdly suggests that the latter word may be used as a participle. In the Bible, we find the following text: "_Me thinketh_ the running of the foremost is like the running of Ahimaaz."--_2 Sam._, xviii, 27. And Milton improperly makes _thought_ an impersonal verb, apparently governing the separate objective pronoun _him_; as, "_Him thought_ he by the brook of Cherith stood." --_P. R._, B. ii, l. 264. OBS. 7.--Some verbs from the nature of the subjects to which they refer, are chiefly confined to the third person singular; as, "It _rains_; it _snows_; it _freezes_; it _hails_; it _lightens_; it _thunders_." These have been called _impersonal verbs_; because the neuter pronoun it, which is commonly used
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813  
814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
impersonal
 

thought

 

running

 
person
 
methought
 

objective

 
apparently
 

pronoun

 
called
 

nominative


equivalent

 

language

 

Webster

 

confined

 

Johnson

 

singular

 
adverb
 

subjects

 

nature

 

methinking


participles

 
expressed
 

defective

 

chiefly

 

writers

 
Addison
 

countenanced

 

Dryden

 

commonly

 

neuter


lexicographers

 

compounded

 

freezes

 

lightens

 

thunders

 
participial
 
construction
 

Milton

 

improperly

 

worthy


Ahimaaz

 

governing

 

Cherith

 
separate
 

foremost

 
octavo
 

absurdly

 

suggests

 

quarto

 

American