FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791  
792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   >>   >|  
good reason to join _not_ to _canst_ as to _can_; and sometimes its union with the latter is a gross error: as, "He _cannot only_ make a way to escape, but with the injunction to duty can infuse the power to perform."--_Maturin's Sermons_, p. 287. The fear of ambiguity never prevents us from disjoining _can_ and _not_ whenever we wish to put a word between them: as, "Though the waves thereof toss themselves, yet _can_ they _not_ prevail; though they roar, yet _can_ they _not_ pass over it."--_Jeremiah_, v, 22. "Which then I _can_ resist _not_."--_Byron's Manfred_, p. 1. "_Can_ I _not_ mountain maiden spy, But she must bear the Douglas eye?"--_Scott_. OBS. 4.--In negative questions, the adverb _not_ is sometimes placed before the nominative, and sometimes after it: as, "Told _not I_ thee?"--_Numb._, xxiii, 26. "Spake _I not_ also to thy messengers?"--_Ib._, xxiv, 12. "_Cannot I_ do with you as this potter?"--_Jer._, xviii, 6. "Art _not thou_ a seer?"--_2 Sam._, xv, 27. "Did _not Israel_ know?"--_Rom._, x, 19. "Have _they not_ heard?"--_Ib._, 18. "Do _not they_ blaspheme that worthy name?"--_James_, ii, 7. This adverb, like every other, should be placed where it will sound most agreeably, and best suit the sense. Dr. Priestley imagined that it could not properly come before the nominative. He says, "When the nominative case is put after the verb, on account of _an_ interrogation, _no other word_ should be interposed between them. [EXAMPLES:] 'May _not we_ here say with Lucretius?'--Addison on Medals, p. 29. May _we not_ say? 'Is _not it_ he.' [?] Smollett's Voltaire, Vol 18, p. 152. Is _it not_ he. [?]"--_Priestley's Gram._, p. 177. OBS. 5.--In grave discourse, or in oratory, the adverb _not_ is spoken as distinctly as other words; but, _ordinarily_, when placed before the nominative, it is rapidly slurred over in utterance and the _o_ is not heard. In fact, it is _generally_ (though inelegantly) contracted in familiar conversation, and joined to the auxiliary: as, IND. Don't they do it? Didn't they do it? Haven't they done it? Hadn't they done it? Shan't, _or_ won't they do it? Won't they have done it? POT. Mayn't, can't, _or_ mustn't they do it? Mightn't, couldn't, wouldn't, _or_ shouldn't they do it? Mayn't, can't, _or_ mustn't they have done it? Mightn't, couldn't, wouldn't, _or_ shouldn't they have done it? OBS. 6.--Well-educated people commonly utter their words with more distinctness and fullness than
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791  
792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
nominative
 

adverb

 

Priestley

 
Mightn
 
couldn
 

shouldn

 
wouldn
 

educated

 
properly
 

imagined


people

 

interposed

 

EXAMPLES

 

interrogation

 

familiar

 

account

 
commonly
 

fullness

 

distinctness

 

agreeably


conversation

 
oratory
 

auxiliary

 

discourse

 

spoken

 
distinctly
 

rapidly

 

slurred

 

ordinarily

 

joined


Lucretius

 

Addison

 

contracted

 

inelegantly

 

generally

 
Medals
 
Smollett
 

Voltaire

 

utterance

 

Though


thereof

 

disjoining

 

prevents

 
prevail
 

resist

 
Manfred
 

Jeremiah

 

ambiguity

 

reason

 

Maturin