FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461  
462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   >>   >|  
opened), are, in parliamentary elections, transmitted by the returning officer to the clerk of the crown in chancery in England, or the sheriff-clerk in Scotland, who destroys them at the end of one year, unless otherwise directed by an order of the House of Commons, or of some court having jurisdiction in election petitions. Such petitions either simply dispute the accuracy of the return on the ground of miscounting, or wrongous rejection or wrongous admission of papers, in which case the court examines the counted and rejected papers; or make allegations of corruption, &c. on which it may be necessary to refer to the marked counterfoils and ascertain how bribed voters have voted. Since the elections of 1874 much discontent has been expressed, because judges have rejected papers with trifling (perhaps accidental) marks other than the X upon them, and because elections have been lost through the failure of the officer to stamp the papers. For this purpose the use has been suggested of a perforating instead of an embossing stamp, while a dark-ground paper with white voting-spaces would make _misplaced_ votes impossible. The Ballot Act introduced several new offences, such as forging of papers or fraudulently defacing or destroying a paper or the official mark; supplying a paper without due authority; fraudulently putting into the box a non-official paper; fraudulently taking a paper out of the station without due authority; destroying, taking, opening or otherwise interfering with a box or packet of papers then in use for election purposes. These offences and attempts to commit them are punishable in the case of officers and clerks with imprisonment for two years, with or without hard labour. In other cases the term of imprisonment is six months. The ballot was long criticized as leading to universal hypocrisy and deception; and Sydney Smith spoke of "voters, in dominos, going to the poll in sedan-chairs with closely-drawn curtains." The observed effect of a secret ballot has been, however, gradually to exterminate undue influence. The alarm of "the confessional" seems to be unfounded, as a Catholic penitent is not bound to [v.03 p.0280] confess his vote, and if he did so, it would be a crime in the confessor to divulge it. _Continental Europe._--The ballot is largely employed in European countries. In France, where from 1840 to 1845 the ballot, or _scrutin_, had been used for deliberative voting in the chamber of dep
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461  
462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

papers

 

ballot

 
fraudulently
 

elections

 

petitions

 

voters

 

ground

 

wrongous

 

election

 

voting


authority

 
officer
 
taking
 

official

 
destroying
 

imprisonment

 

offences

 

rejected

 

Sydney

 

dominos


deception

 

hypocrisy

 

leading

 

universal

 
criticized
 

attempts

 
commit
 

purposes

 

opening

 

interfering


packet

 
punishable
 

officers

 

labour

 

clerks

 
months
 

exterminate

 
Continental
 

divulge

 

Europe


largely

 

employed

 
confessor
 

European

 

countries

 
deliberative
 

chamber

 
scrutin
 

France

 

confess