FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327  
328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   >>   >|  
ersons to said Territory, nor to impair the rights arising from said relation," &c. Now, this is very broad. Suppose a law giving the right of transit to the people of the free States, or any law for their protection in the Territory, as inhabitants, is held by the Territorial Judge to "impair the rights arising from said relation." He holds it unconstitutional. Where is the remedy? What views are entertained upon some of these points in some sections of the South we know. If you do not adopt this amendment it is quite in the power of the Legislature to exclude any person from the Territory whose presence there may be thought injurious to slavery. Did the committee intend this? The question upon the adoption of Mr. FOWLER'S amendment resulted as follows: AYES.--Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, Indiana, Illinois, and Iowa--10. NOES.--New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, and Ohio--10. So the amendment was rejected. Mr. GROESBECK:--I move to amend the substitute offered by Mr. FRANKLIN, by inserting after the words "nor shall any law be passed," the words "by Congress or the Territorial Legislature." I think this is necessary to make our intention plain. Otherwise it might be said that the prohibition did not apply to Congress. Mr. FRANKLIN:--I think the suggestion a very proper one. I will accept the amendment. Mr. WILMOT:--I only wish to understand where we are. Have we disposed of the word "facilitate"? The PRESIDENT:--That amendment was not adopted. Mr. WILMOT:--Then I move to insert before the word "_status_," the word "legal." Mr. RUFFIN:--That raises again every question we have been discussing. The word, as used in the substitute, only refers to the status _in fact_. Mr. GUTHRIE:--This brings up all our old troubles. Let us reject it. Mr. RANDOLPH:--I wish to understand this subject, and what will be the effect of adopting this amendment. I understand that the slave has what we call a _status_. The substitute of Mr. FRANKLIN is intended specifically to recognize and protect that _status_ in the Territories as fully as it is protected and recognized in the States. I think it has that effect. Adopt the amendment, and the effect is precisely the opposite. The amendment rescinds the _status_. Mr. PALMER:--I wish to make an inquiry of the mover.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327  
328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

amendment

 
status
 
effect
 

understand

 
Territory
 
substitute
 

FRANKLIN

 

Legislature

 

WILMOT

 

question


Congress

 

relation

 
arising
 

impair

 
rights
 

Territorial

 

States

 
adopted
 

PRESIDENT

 

disposed


facilitate

 

Otherwise

 

intention

 

passed

 

insert

 
prohibition
 

proper

 

suggestion

 
accept
 

specifically


recognize

 

protect

 

Territories

 

intended

 
subject
 

adopting

 

protected

 

PALMER

 

inquiry

 
rescinds

opposite
 
recognized
 

precisely

 

RANDOLPH

 

reject

 

discussing

 

RUFFIN

 

raises

 
refers
 

troubles