FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340  
341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   >>   >|  
before him there was as yet no such compilation. (3) The presbyter from whom Irenaeus adopted important lines of thought in the 4th book did not write till after the middle of the second century. (4) Tertullian owes his Christocentric theology, so far as he has such a thing, to Irenaeus (and Melito?).] [Footnote 483: Marcion, as is well known, went still further in his depreciatory judgment of the world, and therefore recognised in the redemption through Christ a pure act of grace.] [Footnote 484: See Molwitz, De [Greek: Anakephalaioseos] in Irenaei theologia potestate, Dresden, 1874.] [Footnote 485: See, e.g., the Epistle to the Ephesians and also the Epistles to the Romans and Galatians.] [Footnote 486: But see the remark made above, p. 220, note 1. We might without loss give up the half of the Apologies in return for the preservation of Justin's chief Antignostic work.] [Footnote 487: According to the Gnostic Christology Christ merely restores the _status quo ante_, according to that of Irenaeus he first and alone realises the hitherto unaccomplished destination of humanity.] [Footnote 488: According to the Gnostic conception the incarnation of the divine, i.e., the fall of _Sophia_, contains, paradoxically expressed, the element of sin; according to Irenaeus' idea the element of redemption. Hence we must compare not only the Gnostic Christ, but the Gnostic Sophia, with the Christ of the Church. Irenaeus himself did so in II. 20. 3.] [Footnote 489: After tracing in II. 14 the origin of the Gnostic theologoumena to the Greek philosophers Irenaeus continues Sec. 7: "Dicemus autem adversus eos: utramne hi omnes qui praedicti sunt, cum quibus eadem dicentes arguimini (Scil. "ye Gnostics with the philosophers"), cognoverunt veritatem aut non cognoverunt? Et si quidem cognoverunt, superflua est salvatoris in hunc mundum descensio. Ut (lege "ad") quid enim descendebat?" It is characteristic of Irenaeus not to ask what is new in the revelations of God (through the prophets and the Logos), but quite definitely: "Cur descendit salvator in hunc mundum?" See also lib. III. praef.: "veritas, hoc est dei filii doctrina", III. 10. 3: "Haec est salutis agnitio quae deerat eis, quae est filii del agnitio ... agnitio salutis erat agnitio filii dei, qui et salus et salvator et salutare vere et dicitur et est." III. 11. 3: III. 12. 7: IV. 24.] [Footnote 490: See II. 24. 3, 4: "Non enim ex nobis neque ex nostra natura vi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340  
341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 
Irenaeus
 
Gnostic
 

agnitio

 
Christ
 
cognoverunt
 

Sophia

 

mundum

 

salvator

 

redemption


philosophers

 

element

 
According
 

salutis

 
utramne
 

arguimini

 

Gnostics

 
quibus
 

praedicti

 

veritatem


dicentes

 

compare

 

Church

 

expressed

 

continues

 
Dicemus
 

theologoumena

 

tracing

 
origin
 

adversus


doctrina

 

veritas

 

descendit

 

deerat

 
dicitur
 

salutare

 

descensio

 

salvatoris

 

natura

 
quidem

superflua
 
descendebat
 

revelations

 

prophets

 

nostra

 

paradoxically

 

characteristic

 

depreciatory

 
judgment
 

Melito