FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504  
505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   >>   >|  
ing to the chronology adopted in our English Bible, all the Pastoral Epistles were written after Paul's release from his first imprisonment, and this theory has recently been strenuously advocated by Conybeare and Howson, Alford, and Ellicott; but their reasonings are exceedingly unsatisfactory. For, I. The statement of Conybeare and Howson that "the three epistles were nearly contemporaneous with each other" is a mere assertion resting on no solid foundation; as resemblance in style, especially when all the letters were dictated by the same individual, can be no evidence as to date. II. There is direct evidence that heresies, such as those described in these epistles, existed in the Church long before Paul's first imprisonment. See 1 Cor. iii. 18, 19, xv. 12; 2 Cor. xi. 4, 13, 14, 15, 22, compared with 1 Tim. i. 3, 7. III. The early Churches were very soon organised, as appears from Acts xiv. 23; 1 Thess. v. 12, 13; so that the state of ecclesiastical organisation described in the First Epistle to Timothy and the Epistle to Titus is no proof of the late date of these letters. IV. But the grand argument in support of the early date, and one with which the advocates of the later chronology have never fairly grappled, is derived from the fact that Paul never was in Ephesus after the time mentioned in Acts xx. When he wrote to Timothy he intended shortly to return thither. See 1 Tim. i. 3, iii. 14, 15. It is evident that when the apostle addressed the elders of Ephesus (Acts xx. 25) and told them they should "see his face no more," he considered himself as speaking prophetically. It is clear, too, that his words were so understood by his auditors (Acts xx. 38), and that the evangelist, who wrote them down several years afterwards, was still under the same impression. I agree, therefore, with Wieseler, and others, in assigning an early date to the First Epistle to Timothy and the Epistle to Titus. [130:1] 2 Cor. xi. 9, 24-28, 32, 33, xii. 2, 7-9. The Second Epistle to the Corinthians was written late in A.D. 57. [130:2] 2 Cor. ii. 4. [130:3] [Greek: eis ten Hellada], _i.e._, Achaia. [130:4] Acts xx. 2, 3. [130:5] Rom. xvi. 1, 2, 23. [130:6] Rom. i. 8. [130:7] Rom. xvi. 7, 11. [130:8] Rom. xvi. 3. [130:9] Acts xix. 21; Rom. i. 10, 11, xv. 23, 24. [131:1] Acts xx. 3. [131:2] Acts xx. 6. [131:3] Acts xx. 6. [131:4] Acts xx. 17-35. [131:5] Acts xx. 36-38. [131:6] Acts xxi. 8. [131:7] Acts
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504  
505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Epistle

 

Timothy

 

letters

 
evidence
 

Ephesus

 

imprisonment

 

written

 
epistles
 
Conybeare
 

chronology


Howson

 

elders

 

Achaia

 

mentioned

 

intended

 
shortly
 

evident

 

apostle

 

return

 

thither


addressed

 

evangelist

 

auditors

 

impression

 
assigning
 

understood

 

considered

 
Wieseler
 
speaking
 

Second


prophetically
 

Corinthians

 

Hellada

 

contemporaneous

 

statement

 

exceedingly

 
unsatisfactory
 

resemblance

 

dictated

 
foundation

assertion

 

resting

 

reasonings

 
Pastoral
 

Epistles

 

release

 

English

 

adopted

 

theory

 
Ellicott