FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>   >|  
e one in the many, the same amidst the different, the identity signified by the common name. The name of an attribute as thought of by itself without reference to any individual or class possessing it, is called an ABSTRACT name. By contradistinction, the name of an individual or a class is CONCRETE. Technical terms are wanted also to express the relation of the individuals and the attributes to the general name. The individuals jointly are spoken of as the DENOTATION, or EXTENSION or SCOPE of the name; the common attributes as its CONNOTATION, INTENSION, COMPREHENSION, or GROUND. The whole denotation, etc., is the class; the whole connotation, etc., is the concept.[1] The limits of a "class" in Logic are fixed by the common attributes. Any individual object that possesses these is a member. The statement of them is the DEFINITION. To predicate a general name of any object, as, "This is a cat," "This is a very sad affair," is to refer that object to a class, which is equivalent to saying that it has certain features of resemblance with other objects, that it reminds us of them by its likeness to them. Thus to say that the predicate of every proposition is a general name, expressed or implied, is the same as to say that every predication may be taken as a reference to a class. Ordinarily our notion or concept of the common features signified by general names is vague and hazy. The business of Logic is to make them clear. It is to this end that the individual objects of the class are summoned before the mind. In ordinary thinking there is no definite array or muster of objects: when we think of "dog" or "cat," "accident," "book," "beggar," "ratepayer," we do not stop to call before the mind a host of representatives of the class, nor do we take precise account of their common attributes. The concept of "house" is what all houses have in common. To make this explicit would be no easy matter, and yet we are constantly referring objects to the class "house". We shall see presently that if we wish to make the connotation or concept clear we must run over the denotation or class, that is to say, the objects to which the general name is applied in common usage. Try, for example, to conceive clearly what is meant by house, tree, dog, walking-stick. You think of individual objects, so-called, and of what they have in common. A class may be constituted on one property or on many. There are several points common to all hou
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

common

 
objects
 

general

 

individual

 

attributes

 

concept

 
object
 

predicate

 

denotation

 
connotation

features

 
signified
 

individuals

 

reference

 
called
 
ratepayer
 
representatives
 

beggar

 

property

 
points

definite

 

thinking

 

muster

 

accident

 

precise

 

constituted

 

account

 
referring
 

constantly

 

applied


presently
 
ordinary
 
matter
 

walking

 

houses

 
explicit
 
conceive
 

DENOTATION

 

EXTENSION

 

spoken


jointly

 
express
 

relation

 

CONNOTATION

 

INTENSION

 

possesses

 

limits

 
COMPREHENSION
 

GROUND

 
wanted