FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66  
67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   >>   >|  
onnote_ or _signify secondarily_ ([Greek: prossemainein]) the subject of inhesion". The truth is that Mansel's view was a theory of usage not a statement of actual usage, and he had good reason for putting it doubtfully. As a matter of fact, the history of the distinction follows the simple type of increasing precision and complexity, and Mill was in strict accord with standard tradition. By the Nominalist commentators on the _Summulae_ of Petrus Hispanus certain names, adjectives grammatically, are called _Connotativa_ as opposed to _Absoluta_, simply because they have a double function. White is connotative as signifying both a subject, such as Socrates, of whom "whiteness" is an attribute, and an attribute "whiteness": the names "Socrates" and "whiteness" are Absolute, as having but a single signification. Occam himself speaks of the subject as the primary signification, and the attribute as the secondary, because the answer to "What is white?" is "Something informed with whiteness," and the subject is in the nominative case while the attribute is in an oblique case (_Logic_, part I. chap. x.). Later on we find that Tataretus (_Expositio in Summulas_, A.D. 1501), while mentioning (Tract. Sept. _De Appellationibus_) that it is a matter of dispute among Doctores whether a connotative name _connotat_ the subject or the attribute, is perfectly explicit in his own definition, "Terminus connotativus est qui praeter illud pro quo supponit connotat aliquid adjacere vel non adjacere rei pro qua supponit" (Tract. Sept. _De Suppositionibus_). And this remained the standard usage as long as the distinction remained in logical text-books. We find it very clearly expressed by Clichtoveus, a Nominalist, quoted as an authority by Guthutius in his _Gymnasium Speculativum_, Paris, 1607 (_De Terminorum Cognitione_, pp. 78-9). "Terminus absolutus est, qui solum illud pro quo in propositione supponit, significat. Connotativus autem, qui ultra idipsum, aliud importat." Thus _man_ and _animal_ are absolute terms, which simply stand for (supponunt pro) the things they signify. _White_ is a connotative name, because "it stands for (supponit pro) a subject in which it is an accident: and beyond this, still signifies an accident, which is in that subject, and is expressed by an abstract
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66  
67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

subject

 
attribute
 

whiteness

 

supponit

 

connotative

 

expressed

 
distinction
 

Nominalist

 

adjacere

 
signification

standard

 
Socrates
 

simply

 

accident

 
signify
 
remained
 
connotat
 

matter

 

Terminus

 
Suppositionibus

connotativus

 

perfectly

 

Doctores

 

Appellationibus

 

dispute

 

explicit

 

aliquid

 
praeter
 

definition

 

Clichtoveus


importat
 
idipsum
 
significat
 

Connotativus

 

animal

 
absolute
 
signifies
 

abstract

 

stands

 

things


supponunt

 
propositione
 

mentioning

 

quoted

 

authority

 

logical

 

Guthutius

 
Gymnasium
 

absolutus

 
Cognitione