FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  
ality or Inequality. But both lay stress upon Coexistence and Succession, and we shall find that the distinctions between Simple Sequence and Causal Sequence, and between Repeated and Occasional Coexistence, are all-important in the Logic of Investigation. But for syllogistic purposes the distinctions have no relevance. CHAPTER II. THE "OPPOSITION" OF PROPOSITIONS.--THE INTERPRETATION OF "NO". Propositions are technically said to be "opposed" when, having the same terms in Subject and Predicate, they differ in Quantity, or in Quality, or in both.[1] The practical question from which the technical doctrine has been developed was how to determine the significance of contradiction. What is meant by giving the answer "No" to a proposition put interrogatively? What is the interpretation of "No"? What is the respondent committed to thereby? "Have all ratepayers a vote?" If you answer "No," you are bound to admit that some ratepayers have not. O is the CONTRADICTORY of A. If A is false, O must be true. So if you deny O, you are bound to admit A: one or other must be true: either Some ratepayers have not a vote or All have. Is it the case that no man can live without sleep? Deny this, and you commit yourself to maintaining that Some man, one at least, can live without sleep. I is the Contradictory of E; and _vice versa_. Contradictory opposition is distinguished from CONTRARY, the opposition of one Universal to another, of A to E and E to A. There is a natural tendency to meet a strong assertion with the very reverse. Let it be maintained that women are essentially faithless or that "the poor in a lump is bad," and disputants are apt to meet this extreme with another, that constancy is to be found only in women or true virtue only among the poor. Both extremes, both A and E, may be false: the truth may lie between: Some are, Some not. Logically, the denial of A or E implies only the admission of O or I. You are not committed to the full contrary. But the implication of the Contradictory is absolute; there is no half-way house where the truth may reside. Hence the name of EXCLUDED MIDDLE is applied to the principle that "Of two Contradictories one or other must be true: they cannot both be false". While both CONTRARIES may be false, they cannot both be true. It is sometimes said that in the case of Singular propositions, the Contradictory and the Contrary coincide. A more correct doctrine is that in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Contradictory
 

ratepayers

 

Coexistence

 
doctrine
 

committed

 

answer

 
distinctions
 

Sequence

 

opposition

 
natural

tendency

 

distinguished

 

Inequality

 
disputants
 
essentially
 

reverse

 

maintained

 

CONTRARY

 
Universal
 

strong


assertion

 

faithless

 

virtue

 

applied

 

principle

 

MIDDLE

 

EXCLUDED

 

reside

 

Contradictories

 

Contrary


coincide

 

correct

 
propositions
 

Singular

 

CONTRARIES

 
extremes
 

Logically

 

extreme

 

constancy

 

denial


implies

 

absolute

 
implication
 

contrary

 

admission

 
Predicate
 

differ

 
Quantity
 
Subject
 
Quality