FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137  
138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   >>   >|  
laws are of relations among the various items of knowledge. Aristotle's category of Relation is a fourth kind of relation not to be confused with the others. "Father--son," "uncle--nephew," "slave--master," are _relata_ in Aristotle's sense: "father," "uncle" are homogeneous counter-relatives, varieties of kinship; so "slave," "freeman" are counter-relatives in social status.] [Footnote 2: Dr. Caird's _Hegel_, p. 134.] [Footnote 3: See article on Counter-Sense, _Contemporary Review_, April, 1884.] PART IV. THE INTERDEPENDENCE OF PROPOSITIONS.--MEDIATE INFERENCE. --SYLLOGISM. CHAPTER I. THE SYLLOGISM. We have already defined mediate inference as the derivation of a conclusion from more than one proposition. The type or form of a mediate inference fully expressed consists of three propositions so related that one of them is involved or implied in the other two. Distraction is exhausting. Modern life is full of distraction [.'.] Modern life is exhausting. We say nothing of the truth of these propositions. I purposely choose questionable ones. But do they hang together? If you admit the first two, are you bound in consistency to admit the third? Is the truth of the conclusion a necessary consequence of the truth of the premisses? If so, it is a valid mediate inference from them. When one of the two premisses is more general than the conclusion, the argument is said to be Deductive. You lead down from the more general to the less general. The general proposition is called the Major Premiss, or Grounding Proposition, or Sumption: the other premiss the Minor, or Applying Proposition, or Subsumption. Undue haste makes waste. This is a case of undue hasting. [.'.] It is a case of undue wasting. We may, and constantly do, apply principles and draw conclusions in this way without making any formal analysis of the propositions. Indeed we reason mediately and deductively whenever we make any application of previous knowledge, although the process is not expressed in propositions at all and is performed so rapidly that we are not conscious of the steps. For example, I enter a room, see a book, open it and begin to read. I want to make a note of something: I look round, see a paper case, open it, take a sheet of paper and a pen, dip the pen in the ink and proceed to write. In the course of all this, I a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137  
138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

general

 

propositions

 

inference

 
conclusion
 
mediate
 

Footnote

 
SYLLOGISM
 

exhausting

 

Modern

 

expressed


Aristotle
 

premisses

 

proposition

 

knowledge

 

counter

 
relatives
 

Proposition

 

hasting

 

Sumption

 
called

Deductive

 
argument
 

Premiss

 

Subsumption

 

Applying

 

Grounding

 

wasting

 
premiss
 

proceed

 

conscious


rapidly

 

making

 

formal

 

analysis

 

conclusions

 

constantly

 

principles

 

Indeed

 

reason

 

process


performed

 

previous

 

application

 

mediately

 

deductively

 

status

 
social
 

varieties

 

kinship

 

freeman