FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168  
169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   >>   >|  
lty, If the prisoner is guilty, the witness is not perjured-- do not necessarily hold. If, then, we would guard against fallacy, we must always make sure before assenting to a disjunctive proposition that there is really a complete disjunction or mutual incompatibility between the alternatives. III.--THE DILEMMA. A Dilemma is a combination of Hypothetical and Disjunctive propositions. The word has passed into common speech, and its ordinary use is a clue to the logical structure. We are said to be in a dilemma when we have only two courses open to us and both of them are attended by unpleasant consequences. In argument we are in this position when we are shut into a choice between two admissions, and either admission leads to a conclusion which we do not like. The statement of the alternatives as the consequences hypothetically of certain conditions is the major premiss of the dilemma: once we admit that the relations of Antecedent and Consequent are as stated, we are in a trap, if trap it is: we are on the horns of the dilemma, ready to be tossed from one to the other. For example:-- If A is B, A is C, and if A is not B, A is D. But A either is or is not B. Therefore, A either is C or is D. If A acted of his own motive, he is a knave; if A did not act of his own motive, he is a catspaw. But A either acted of his own motive or he did not. Thereupon A is either a knave or a catspaw. This is an example of the _Constructive_ Dilemma, the form of it corresponding to the common use of the word as a choice between equally unpleasant alternatives. The standard example is the dilemma in which the custodians of the Alexandrian Library are said to have been put by the Caliph Omar in 640 A.D. If your books are in conformity with the Koran, they are superfluous; if they are at variance with it, they are pernicious. But they must either be in conformity with the Koran or at variance with it. Therefore they are either superfluous or pernicious. Where caution has to be exercised is in accepting the clauses of the Major. We must make sure that the asserted relations of Reason and Consequent really hold. It is there that fallacy is apt to creep in and hide its head. The Alexandrian Librarians were rash in accepting the first clause of the conqueror's Major: it does not follow that the books are superfluous unless the doctrines of the Koran are not merely sound but
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168  
169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

dilemma

 

alternatives

 

superfluous

 
motive
 
Consequent
 

relations

 
Therefore
 

catspaw

 

unpleasant

 

consequences


Alexandrian
 

choice

 

conformity

 

variance

 

Dilemma

 
fallacy
 

accepting

 

common

 

pernicious

 
Thereupon

clause

 
doctrines
 

follow

 

conqueror

 

Librarians

 

exercised

 

caution

 
asserted
 

Reason

 

Caliph


equally

 

clauses

 

standard

 

custodians

 

Library

 

Constructive

 

conclusion

 

DILEMMA

 

combination

 

Hypothetical


mutual

 

incompatibility

 

Disjunctive

 

propositions

 

logical

 

structure

 
ordinary
 

passed

 

speech

 

disjunction