| y type.'"
The above despatch was published in the April 26, 1919, issue of "The
New York Times."
On April 28, 1919, the following very apt comment was made on it and
appeared on the editorial page of the "New York Times":
     "As explained by somebody whom a Milan paper calls a 'Bolshevist
     statesman,' marriage as regulated by the great and good Lenine is
     not at all the dreadful thing described recently by the mendacious
     enemies of his Socialistic paradise. As pictured by his friends,
     nothing worse has been done than to exert a gentle pressure on the
     marriageable unmarried to the end that they may do their duty to
     the Bolshevist State and provide it as soon as may be with new sons
     and daughters to take the place of those recently 'removed' by a
     benevolent terrorism.
     "Bachelorhood and spinsterhood are to be regarded as
     'irregular'--conditions that must be explained in writing to the
     proper authorities. For the well disposed a simple civil marriage
     ceremony is provided; also a simple divorce ceremony in case the
     union proves wearisome. And that is all there is to the Bolshevist
     marriage system, the statesman says.
     "But one notices that he does not disclose what is done to those
     who fail to find pleasing mates in the six months allowed after
     notification for the making of a choice. Apparently it is then that
     the so-called nationalization of women comes in, and the statesman
     forgot to say a word about the only peculiarity of the system that
     has evolved any serious criticism."
Commenting on Bolshevism, Mr. Eber Cole Byam, in the April 26, 1919,
issue of "America," very aptly says:
     "As the Roman world was reduced to barbarism by the barbarians so
     now the modern world is threatened with reduction to Bolshevism by
     the Bolsheviki. Whatever the word Bolshevism may have meant
     originally it has come to mean fiendish treatment of women, the
     savage murder and mutilation of men and the wanton destruction of
     the accumulated labors of generations. The Bolshevik is a
     Socialist, not the armchair theorist dreaming fantastic fancies.
     The Bolshevik is the real Socialist, the Socialist of practice."
The following encomium on Bolshevism appeared in "The Call," New York,
April 26, 1919, and shows what strange inclinations the Socialists have
towards barbarism:
     "For the first time in |