or every fifty people in a mixed train there is a carriage weight
of eighteen tons, at a cost of 1500l.
The following Table, extracted from a Return moved for by Lord
Brougham, may help to give a better general idea of the reason why our
Railroads have been so costly:--
Name of London & Great Midland, South Eastern Total
Railway. North Western, and 12 and 6
Western, and 3 branches branches
and 12 branches
branches
Length/Miles 433 215-3/4 449-1/4 198-1/2 1296-1/2
Cost of Con-
struction. L 13,302,313 6,961,011 9,064,089 5,375,366 34,702,779
Conveyance
and Law
Charges. L 143,479 105,269 119,344 138,034 506,128
Cost of
Land. L 3,153,226 1,132,964 1,764,582 1,458,627 7,509,399
Parliamentary
Expenses. L 555,698 245,139 287,853 420,467 1,509,157
Engineering
and Sur-
veying. L 289,698 201,909 216,110 116,039 823,756
Total
Cost. L 17,444,414 8,646,292 11,451,978 7,508,533 45,051,217
When all the foregoing facts are taken into consideration, it must
appear clear to the reader, that until the efficiency of the work done,
the actual number of miles of rail laid down, and the comfort enjoyed
are ascertained, any comparison of the relative expenses of the
respective railways must be alike useless and erroneous; at the same
time, it can scarcely be denied that it is impossible to give the
Republic too much credit for the energy, engineering skill, and economy
with which they have railway-netted the whole continent. Much remains
for them to do in the way of organizing the corps of officials, and in
the erection of proper stations, sufficient at all events, to protect
travellers from the weather, for which too common neglect the abundance
of wood and their admirable machinery leave them without excuse; not
that we are without sin ourselves in this last particular. The uncovered
station at Warrington is a disgrace to the wealthy London and North
Western Company, and the inconveniences for changing trains at Gretna
junction is even more disreputable; but these form the rare exceptions,
and as a general rule, there cannot be the slightest comparison between
the admirably arranged corps of railway servants in England, and the
same class of men in the States; nor between the
|