FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  
rse immediately ceases to exist, and the entire structure of informative bidding thereby drops to pieces. The system of suit declarations above outlined, and upon which all that is hereinafter suggested in relation to bidding is based, must be followed by players who wish to give their partners accurate data, and while it may be tempting at times to depart from the conventional, the more frequently such exception is made by the Dealer in his bid, the more often does misunderstanding between the partners ensue. VARIOUS IDEAS OF THE TWO SPADE BID Every game of the Whist family has some point upon which experts disagree, and which, consequently, produces apparently interminable discussion. In Auction, it is the two Spade bid, and no less than four recognized factions have widely divergent views concerning it. These views may be briefly stated as follows:-- (_a_) With the border-line No-trumpers now in vogue, a hand not strong enough to bid No-trump is too weak to warrant any call but one Spade. The two Spade bid is, therefore, useless and should never be made. (_b_) The two Spade bid should be used as a No-trump invitation with any hand not quite strong enough to justify a No-trump call. Having this meaning it does not matter whether the hand contain any Spade strength. (_c_) The two Spade bid should be used as a No-trump invitation, but must also give the additional information that the hand contains at least one trick in Spades. (_d_) The two Spade bid should be used to tell the partner that the hand has the high-card strength to bid one Royal, but not sufficient length. It thus becomes either a No-trump or Royal invitation. All these systems have their advocates, most of whom refuse to see merit in any plan but their own. It is only fair, however, before reaching a definite conclusion to accord to all a fair and dispassionate consideration. (_a_) The argument that, as long as light No-trumpers are conventional, any hand not sufficiently strong to call No-trump is too weak to justify declaring more than one Spade, has considerable force. Beyond question, many followers of plans "_b_" and "_c_" call two Spades when their holdings do not warrant such action, but the fact that a declaration is at times abused is far from being a sufficient reason for wiping it off the Auction map, and saying to those who
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

strong

 

invitation

 

conventional

 

justify

 
Auction
 

Spades

 

sufficient

 

partners

 

bidding

 

warrant


trumpers

 

strength

 

matter

 
meaning
 
Having
 
length
 

information

 

additional

 

partner

 

followers


holdings

 

question

 

declaring

 
considerable
 

Beyond

 

action

 
wiping
 
reason
 

declaration

 
abused

sufficiently
 

refuse

 
advocates
 

systems

 
consideration
 

dispassionate

 

argument

 
accord
 

conclusion

 

reaching


definite

 
tempting
 

depart

 

frequently

 
players
 

accurate

 

exception

 

Dealer

 
VARIOUS
 

misunderstanding