FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69  
70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   >>   >|  
n the Second Hand has declared. The distinction between these three situations is so clearly drawn that each is really a separate and distinct subject. They will be taken up _seriatim_. WHEN THE DEALER HAS CALLED ONE SPADE, AND THE SECOND HAND PASSED In the old days, when the Dealer's "one Spade" was without significance, the Third Hand was always obliged to declare, in order to give the Dealer the opportunity to get back into the game, as it was possible that he had great strength. Now the Third Hand recognizes that there is not the least obligation upon him to bid, and that it is inadvisable for him to do so unless his hand be so strong that, even with a weak partner, game is in sight, or unless it be important for him to indicate to the Dealer what to lead if the Fourth Hand make the final declaration. Should the Third Hand pass, and the Fourth Hand also pass, allowing the one Spade declaration to stand, the liability of the Declarer cannot exceed 100 points, but if the Third Hand bid, the liability becomes unlimited. While the Dealer and Second Hand both have the right to assume that their partners have an average percentage of the remaining cards, the Third Hand is not justified in any such presumption, after the Dealer, by bidding one Spade, has virtually waved the red flag. True it is, a similar warning has appeared on the right, but if both danger signals are to be believed, the only inference is that the strength is massed on the left. The bidding by the Third Hand must, therefore, be of a very different character from that of the Dealer or Second Hand. He should not venture a No-trump unless he have four sure tricks with the probability of more and at least three suits stopped. When in doubt whether to declare No-trump or a suit, it is generally wise for him to select the latter. Third Hand suit declarations should be made under either of two conditions:-- (_a_) When the hand is so strong that there appears to be at least a fair chance for game with the suit he names as Trump. (_b_) When he expects a No-trump from the Fourth Hand and wishes to indicate to his partner the lead he desires. In the former case, it is often good policy for the Third Hand to start with a bid of two. This serves a double purpose, as it shows the Dealer the character of the hand and helps to shut out an adverse declaration. If the main idea of the bid be to indicate a lead, it is advisable to make
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69  
70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Dealer

 

Fourth

 

declaration

 

Second

 
partner
 

strength

 

strong

 

character

 

bidding

 

liability


declare

 

declarations

 

massed

 
inference
 
expects
 
believed
 

virtually

 

appears

 

similar

 

warning


danger

 

signals

 

advisable

 
appeared
 

conditions

 

probability

 
generally
 
tricks
 

policy

 
stopped

serves
 

adverse

 
select
 

desires

 
venture
 

purpose

 

double

 
chance
 

wishes

 

allowing


SECOND

 
PASSED
 

CALLED

 

opportunity

 
obliged
 

significance

 

DEALER

 

situations

 
declared
 

distinction