FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  
that the Third Hand is justified in overbidding the Dealer's No-trump.[19] [19] See pages 96-108 inc. 7. WHEN THE DEALER AND THIRD HAND HAVE MADE OFFENSIVE DECLARATIONS AND THE SECOND HAND PASSED In this case, both adversaries having shown strength, and the partner weakness, it is dangerous for the Fourth Hand to declare, and he should do so only when his holding convinces him that his declaration is not likely to be successfully doubled. 8. WHEN ALL THREE PLAYERS HAVE MADE OFFENSIVE DECLARATIONS This case is entirely analogous to the second round or late bidding, and is covered under the head of CONTINUATION OF THE BIDDING. VI CONTINUATION OF THE BIDDING After the completion of the first round, the situation of the bidder becomes so complex that it is most difficult to apply general rules. Some principles, however, should be borne in mind. Bidding one Spade, or passing, places a player with two tricks in a position to increase his partner's call; but when a bidder has already shown the full strength, or practically the full strength, of his hand, he should not, under any circumstances, advance either his own or his partner's declaration. The temptation to disregard this rule is at times exceedingly strong. For example, the dealer declares one Heart, holding King, Queen, at the top of five Hearts, and the Ace of Spades. The partner calls one No-trump, and the Fourth Hand, two Royals. In such case, the original Heart bidder frequently advances the No-trump to two, because he has the adverse suit stopped, without considering that his partner, in bidding one No-trump, counted upon him for either that Ace of Spades, or the equivalent strength, and, therefore, he should leave the question of the continuance of the No-trump to the player who knows its exact strength. Another example of this proposition may be worthy of consideration. The dealer holds Spades X, X, X Hearts Ace, X Diamonds King, Knave, Ten, X, X Clubs X, X, X He bids one Diamond; Second Hand, pass; Third Hand, one Heart; Fourth Hand, one Royal. In this position a thoughtless player might call two Hearts, but such a declaration would greatly exaggerate the value of the hand. The dealer by his first bid has announced his ability to take at least three tricks if Diamonds be Trump, and at least two tricks if the deal be played without a Trump. His hand justifies such a call, but that is a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
strength
 
partner
 
bidder
 
Spades
 

player

 

declaration

 

tricks

 

Fourth

 

Hearts

 

dealer


position

 

Diamonds

 

BIDDING

 

CONTINUATION

 

bidding

 

OFFENSIVE

 

DECLARATIONS

 
holding
 
counted
 

adverse


stopped

 

advances

 
Royals
 

original

 

declares

 

equivalent

 
frequently
 

greatly

 

exaggerate

 
thoughtless

played

 
justifies
 

announced

 

ability

 
Second
 

Diamond

 

Another

 

question

 

continuance

 

proposition


worthy

 
consideration
 
successfully
 

doubled

 

convinces

 

declare

 

analogous

 

PLAYERS

 

dangerous

 
weakness