FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252  
253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>   >|  
hout. 5. Exposition of a proposition may use any one of the following methods-- _a._ By repetition. _b._ By giving examples. _c._ By stating comparisons and contrasts. _d._ By making obverse statements. _e._ By relating particulars or details. _f._ By stating cause or effect. _g._ By any suitable combination of these methods. XI. ARGUMENT +170. Difference between Argument and Exposition.+--Argument differs from exposition in its purpose. By exposition we endeavor to make clear the meaning of a proposition; by argument we attempt to prove its truth. If a person does not understand what we mean, we explain; if, after he does understand, he does not believe, we argue. Often a simple explanation is sufficient to convince. As soon as the reader understands the real meaning of a proposition, he accepts our view of the case. A heated discussion may end with the statement, "Oh, if that is what you mean, I agree with you." In Section 70, we have learned that the first step in argument is explanation, by which we make clear the meaning of the proposition the truth of which we wish to establish. This explanation may include both the expounding of the terms in the proposition and the explanation of the proposition as a whole. There is another difference between exposition and argument. We cannot argue about single terms, though we may explain them. We may explain what is meant by the term _elective studies_, or _civil service;_ but an argument requires a proposition such as, Pupils should be allowed to choose their own studies, or, Civil Service should be established. Even with such a topic as Expansion or Restricted Immigration, which seems to be a subject of argument, there is really an implied proposition under discussion; as, The United States should acquire control of territory outside of its present boundaries; or, It should be the policy of our government to restrict immigration. We may explain the meaning of single terms or of propositions, but in order to argue, we must have a proposition either expressed or implied. +171. Proposition of Fact and Proposition of Theory.+--Some propositions state facts and some propositions state theories. Every argument therefore aims either to prove the occurrence of a fact or the truth of a theory. The first would attempt to show the actual or probable truth of a specific proposition; for example:-- Nero was guilty of burning Rome.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252  
253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

proposition

 

argument

 

explanation

 

explain

 

meaning

 

exposition

 
propositions
 
understand
 

methods

 

Exposition


implied

 

discussion

 

stating

 

attempt

 

Argument

 

studies

 

single

 

Proposition

 

Expansion

 
theory

elective

 

subject

 

Immigration

 

Restricted

 

established

 

choose

 

requires

 

Pupils

 
allowed
 

actual


burning

 

service

 

Service

 

guilty

 

specific

 
theories
 

immigration

 

restrict

 

government

 

probable


Theory

 
expressed
 

territory

 

control

 

acquire

 

United

 
States
 

present

 

policy

 
occurrence