FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262  
263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   >>   >|  
ry here, but it will be of value to consider briefly three chief errors. If the terms are not used with the same meaning throughout, the conclusion is valueless. A person might agree with you that domestic arts should be taught to girls in school, but if you continued by saying that scrubbing the floor is a form of domestic art, therefore the girls should be taught to scrub the floor, he would reject your conclusion because the meaning of the term _domestic art_ as he understood it in the first statement, is not that used in the second. It will be noticed that each syllogism includes three terms. For example, the syllogism,-- All hawks eat flesh; This bird is a hawk; Therefore this bird eats flesh,-- contains the three terms, _hawk, eats flesh, this bird_; of these but two appear in the conclusion. The one which does not (in this case _hawk_) is called the middle term. If the major premise does not make a statement about every member of the class denoted by the middle term, the conclusion may not be valid even though the premises are true. For example:-- All hawks are birds; This chicken is a bird; Therefore this chicken is a hawk. In this case the middle term is _birds_, and the major premise, _All hawks are birds_, does not make a statement which applies to all birds. The conclusion is therefore untrue. Such an argument is a fallacy. The validity of the conclusion is impaired if either premise is false. In the enthymeme, "Henry is a coward; he dare not run away from school," the suppressed premise, "All persons who will not run away from school, are cowards," is not true, and so invalidates the conclusion. It is well to test the validity of your own argument and that of your opponent by seeking for the suppressed premise and stating it, for this may reveal a fatal weakness in the thought. EXERCISES Which of the following are incorrect? 1. The government should pay for the education of its people; Travel is a form of education; Therefore the government should pay the traveling expenses of the people. 2. All horses are useful; This animal is useful; Therefore this animal is a horse. 3. I ought not to study algebra because it is a very difficult subject. 4. Pupils ought not to write notes because note writing interferes with the rights of others. 5. All fish can swim; Charles can swim; Therefore Charles is a fish. 6. Henry is a fool because
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262  
263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

conclusion

 

Therefore

 

premise

 

middle

 

statement

 

school

 
domestic
 
animal
 

education

 

people


Charles

 

government

 

argument

 

validity

 

chicken

 

suppressed

 

taught

 

meaning

 

syllogism

 
traveling

Travel

 

incorrect

 

valueless

 

thought

 

seeking

 

person

 

opponent

 

stating

 
reveal
 

EXERCISES


weakness

 

writing

 

interferes

 

rights

 

briefly

 
Pupils
 

horses

 

difficult

 

subject

 

algebra


expenses

 
called
 

reject

 

denoted

 

member

 

understood

 
noticed
 

includes

 

errors

 
coward