FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941  
942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   >>   >|  
, Q. 90, Art. 1] Whether the Soul Was Made or Was of God's Substance? Objection 1: It would seem that the soul was not made, but was God's substance. For it is written (Gen. 2:7): "God formed man of the slime of the earth, and breathed into his face the breath of life, and man was made a living soul." But he who breathes sends forth something of himself. Therefore the soul, whereby man lives, is of the Divine substance. Obj. 2: Further, as above explained (Q. 75, A. 5), the soul is a simple form. But a form is an act. Therefore the soul is a pure act; which applies to God alone. Therefore the soul is of God's substance. Obj. 3: Further, things that exist and do [not] differ are the same. But God and the mind exist, and in no way differ, for they could only be differentiated by certain differences, and thus would be composite. Therefore God and the human mind are the same. _On the contrary,_ Augustine (De Orig. Animae iii, 15) mentions certain opinions which he calls "exceedingly and evidently perverse, and contrary to the Catholic Faith," among which the first is the opinion that "God made the soul not out of nothing, but from Himself." _I answer that,_ To say that the soul is of the Divine substance involves a manifest improbability. For, as is clear from what has been said (Q. 77, A. 2; Q. 79, A. 2; Q. 84, A. 6), the human soul is sometimes in a state of potentiality to the act of intelligence --acquires its knowledge somehow from things--and thus has various powers; all of which are incompatible with the Divine Nature, Which is a pure act--receives nothing from any other--and admits of no variety in itself, as we have proved (Q. 3, AA. 1, 7; Q. 9, A. 1). This error seems to have originated from two statements of the ancients. For those who first began to observe the nature of things, being unable to rise above their imagination, supposed that nothing but bodies existed. Therefore they said that God was a body, which they considered to be the principle of other bodies. And since they held that the soul was of the same nature as that body which they regarded as the first principle, as is stated _De Anima_ i, 2, it followed that the soul was of the nature of God Himself. According to this supposition, also, the Manichaeans, thinking that God was corporeal light, held that the soul was part of that light bound up with the body. Then a further step in advance was made, and some surmised the existence of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941  
942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Therefore

 

substance

 
things
 

Divine

 

nature

 

bodies

 

contrary

 
Further
 

differ

 

Himself


principle

 

knowledge

 

acquires

 

potentiality

 
intelligence
 

powers

 

originated

 

variety

 

receives

 

Nature


admits

 

incompatible

 
proved
 
imagination
 
Manichaeans
 

thinking

 
corporeal
 

supposition

 
According
 
surmised

existence
 

advance

 
unable
 
observe
 

statements

 

ancients

 
regarded
 
stated
 

considered

 
supposed

existed

 

breathes

 

breath

 

living

 

applies

 

simple

 
explained
 

Substance

 
Objection
 

Whether