FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610  
611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   >>   >|  
y to a place comes from gravity or lightness, while the inclination to make something like itself comes from the active qualities. Now the will has a natural tendency towards good. Consequently there alone are essence and will identified where all good is contained within the essence of him who wills; that is to say, in God, Who wills nothing beyond Himself except on account of His goodness. This cannot be said of any creature, because infinite goodness is quite foreign to the nature of any created thing. Accordingly, neither the will of the angel, nor that of any creature, can be the same thing as its essence. In like manner neither can the will be the same thing as the intellect of angel or man. Because knowledge comes about in so far as the object known is within the knower; consequently the intellect extends itself to what is outside it, according as what, in its essence, is outside it is disposed to be somehow within it. On the other hand, the will goes out to what is beyond it, according as by a kind of inclination it tends, in a manner, to what is outside it. Now it belongs to one faculty to have within itself something which is outside it, and to another faculty to tend to what is outside it. Consequently intellect and will must necessarily be different powers in every creature. It is not so with God, for He has within Himself universal being, and the universal good. Therefore both intellect and will are His nature. Reply Obj. 1: A natural body is moved to its own being by its substantial form: while it is inclined to something outside by something additional, as has been said. Reply Obj. 2: Faculties are not differentiated by any material difference of their objects, but according to their formal distinction, which is taken from the nature of the object as such. Consequently the diversity derived from the notion of good and true suffices for the difference of intellect from will. Reply Obj. 3: Because the good and the true are really convertible, it follows that the good is apprehended by the intellect as something true; while the true is desired by the will as something good. Nevertheless, the diversity of their aspects is sufficient for diversifying the faculties, as was said above (ad 2). _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [I, Q. 59, Art. 3] Whether There Is Free-Will in the Angels? Objection 1: It would seem that there is no free-will in the angels. For the act of free-will is to choose
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610  
611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

intellect

 
essence
 

nature

 

creature

 
Consequently
 

manner

 
object
 

faculty

 

universal

 

inclination


diversity

 

difference

 

Because

 

natural

 

Himself

 

goodness

 

differentiated

 
material
 

objects

 

distinction


formal
 

Faculties

 
additional
 
choose
 

angels

 

inclined

 

substantial

 

Whether

 
faculties
 

diversifying


ARTICLE

 
sufficient
 

convertible

 

Objection

 

suffices

 

notion

 

apprehended

 

Nevertheless

 

aspects

 

desired


Angels

 

derived

 

foreign

 

created

 

infinite

 
tendency
 

qualities

 
Accordingly
 

knowledge

 

active