FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574  
575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   >>   >|  
e notion of borrowing ideas from Lincoln; and had he studied the progress of the Illinois canvass, he must have seen that the declaration did not meet with general favour. In February of this year there had been bodied forth in Seward the politician. Now, a far-seeing statesman spoke. One was compared to Webster's 7th-of-March speech,--the other was commended by the Abolitionists."--James F. Rhodes, _History of the United States_, Vol. 2, pp. 344-5.] The result of the election was favourable to the Republicans, Morgan's majority over Parker being 17,440.[503] Ninety-nine members of the Legislature and twenty-nine congressmen were either Republicans or anti-Lecompton men. But, compared with the victory of 1856, it was a disappointment. John A. King had received a majority of 65,000 over Parker. The _Tribune_ was quick to charge some of this loss to Seward. "The clamour against Sewardism lost us many votes," it declared the morning after the election. Two or three days later, as the reduced majority became more apparent, it explained that "A knavish clamour was raised on the eve of election by a Swiss press against Governor Seward's late speech at Rochester as revolutionary and disunionist. Our loss from this source is considerable." The returns, however, showed plainly that one-half of the Americans, following the precedent set in 1857, had voted for Parker, while the other half, irritated by the failure of the union movement at Syracuse, had supported Burrows. Had the coalition succeeded, Morgan's majority must have been larger than King's. But, small as it was, there was abundant cause for Republican rejoicing, since it kept the Empire State in line with the Republican States of New England, Ohio, Michigan, Iowa, and Wisconsin, which were now joined for the first time by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Minnesota. Indeed, of the free States, only California and Oregon had indorsed Buchanan's administration. [Footnote 503: Edwin D. Morgan, 247,953; Amasa J. Parker, 230,513; Lorenzo Burrows, 60,880; Gerrit Smith, 5470.--_Civil List, State of New York_ (1887), p. 166.] CHAPTER XIX SEWARD'S BID FOR THE PRESIDENCY 1859-1860 The elections in 1858 simplified the political situation. With the exception of Pennsylvania, where the tariff question played a conspicuous part, all the Northern States had disapproved President Buchanan's Lecompton policy, and the people, save the old-line Whigs, the Abolitionists,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574  
575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Parker

 

States

 

majority

 

Morgan

 

Seward

 

election

 

Lecompton

 
Republicans
 

Buchanan

 

Abolitionists


Pennsylvania
 

Republican

 
Burrows
 

speech

 

clamour

 

compared

 
England
 
Michigan
 

exception

 
tariff

question

 

Wisconsin

 
Empire
 

Jersey

 

Minnesota

 

political

 

situation

 

joined

 

failure

 
movement

Syracuse

 
irritated
 

precedent

 

supported

 
abundant
 

Indeed

 
played
 
larger
 

conspicuous

 

coalition


succeeded

 

rejoicing

 
simplified
 

Gerrit

 

Lorenzo

 

people

 
CHAPTER
 

SEWARD

 

President

 

PRESIDENCY