FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618  
619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   >>   >|  
d misrepresentation. No intelligent reader of the _Tribune_ has for months been left in doubt of the fact that I deemed the nomination of Governor Seward for President at this time unwise and unsafe; and none can fail to understand that I did my best at Chicago to prevent that nomination. My account of 'Last Week at Chicago' is explicit on that point. True, I do not believe my influence was so controlling as the defeated are disposed to represent it, but this is not material to the issue. It is agreed that I did what I could. "It is not true--it is grossly untrue--that at Chicago I commended myself to the confidence of delegates 'by professions of regard and the most zealous friendship for Governor Seward, but presented defeat, _even in New York_, as the inevitable result of his nomination.' The very reverse of this is the truth. I made no professions before the nomination, as I have uttered no lamentations since. It was the simple duty of each delegate to do just whatever was best for the Republican cause, regardless of personal considerations. And this is exactly what I did.... As to New York, I think I was at least a hundred times asked whether Governor Seward could carry this State;[572] and I am sure I uniformly responded affirmatively, urging delegates to consider the New York delegation the highest authority on that point as I was strenuously urging that the delegations from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Indiana, and Illinois must be regarded as authority as to who could and who could not carry their respective States. [Footnote 572: "At Chicago, Seward encountered the opposition from his own State of such powerful leaders as Greeley, Dudley Field, Bryant, and Wadsworth. The first two were on the ground and very busy. The two latter sent pungent letters that were circulated among the delegates from the various States. The main point of the attack was that Seward could not carry New York. Soon after the adjournment of the convention, William Curtis Noyes, a delegate, told me that a careful canvass of the New York delegation showed that nearly one-fourth of its members believed it was extremely doubtful if Seward could obtain a majority at the polls in that State."--H.B. Stanton, _Random Recollections_, pp. 214-15. "Perhaps the main stumbling block over which he fell in the convention was Thurlow Weed."--_Ibid._, p. 215.] "Mr. Raymond proceeds to state that I had, 'in November, 1854, privately but distinctly repu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618  
619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Seward
 

nomination

 

Chicago

 

delegates

 

Governor

 

States

 
professions
 

delegate

 

delegation

 

authority


convention
 

urging

 

Wadsworth

 
ground
 
Bryant
 
circulated
 

letters

 
pungent
 

regarded

 

respective


Jersey

 

Indiana

 

Illinois

 

Raymond

 

Footnote

 
powerful
 

leaders

 
Greeley
 

Dudley

 

opposition


encountered

 

proceeds

 

Stanton

 

privately

 
obtain
 

distinctly

 
majority
 

Random

 

stumbling

 

November


Perhaps

 

Recollections

 

doubtful

 
extremely
 

careful

 
Curtis
 
William
 

adjournment

 
canvass
 
showed