to the loan in which
appeared the name of Gladstone. He repeated this accusation--a serious
one if true, since Gladstone was a Cabinet member--in his
_Retrospections_ (I, p. 620), and the story has found place in many
writings (e.g., G.P. Putnam, _Memoirs_, p. 213). Gladstone's emphatic
denial, calling the story a "mischievous forgery," appears in Morley,
_Gladstone_, II, p. 83.]
[Footnote 1072: Hansard, 3rd Ser., CLXX, pp. 776-838.]
[Footnote 1073: See _ante_, p. 155.]
[Footnote 1074: The _Index_, May 28, 1863, pp. 72-3.]
[Footnote 1075: The _Times_, June 1, 1863.]
[Footnote 1076: The _Index_, June 4, 1863.]
[Footnote 1077: Chesney, _Military View of Recent Campaigns in Maryland
and Virginia_, London, 1863.]
[Footnote 1078: _Army and Navy Gazette_, June 6, 1863.]
[Footnote 1079: Lyons Papers, May 30, 1863.]
[Footnote 1080: Callahan, _Diplomatic History of the Southern
Confederacy_, p. 184. Callahan's Chapter VIII, "The Crisis in England"
is misnamed, for Roebuck's motion and the whole plan of "bringing in the
Tories" never had a chance of succeeding, as, indeed, Callahan himself
notes. His detailed examination of the incident has unfortunately misled
some historians who have derived from his work the idea that the
critical period of British policy towards America was Midsummer, 1863,
whereas it occurred, in fact, in October-November, 1862 (e.g., Schmidt,
"Wheat and Cotton during the Civil War," pp. 413 _seq_. Schmidt's thesis
is largely dependent on placing the critical period in 1863).]
[Footnote 1081: Mason Papers. To Slidell.]
[Footnote 1082: Callahan, pp. 184-5.]
[Footnote 1083: _Ibid._, p. 186. To Benjamin.]
[Footnote 1084: Mason Papers. Mason to Slidell, June 27, 1863. Mason
wrote: "The question of veracity is raised."]
[Footnote 1085: _Ibid._, Slidell to Mason, June 29, 1863.]
[Footnote 1086: _Ibid._, To Slidell.]
[Footnote 1087: _Ibid._, To Mason. "Monday eve." (June 29, 1863.)]
[Footnote 1088: Callahan, 186; and Hansard, 3rd Ser., CLXXI, p. 1719.]
[Footnote 1089: Punch's favourite cartoon of Roebuck was of a terrier
labelled "Tear 'em," worrying and snarling at his enemies.]
[Footnote 1090: Bright and Lindsay had, in fact, long been warm friends.
They disagreed on the Civil War, but this did not destroy their
friendship.]
[Footnote 1091: Hansard, 3rd. Ser., CLXXI, pp. 1771-1842, for debate of
June 30. Roebuck's egotism was later related by Lamar, then in London on
h
|