FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726  
727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   >>   >|  
eral amount sold against on the Exchange for future delivery. By October, the situation had become acute. Dealers who had classified themselves as jobbers or importers had gone into the retail classification in order to evade the limitations of profit allowed jobbers, and were limiting their sales to lots of twenty-five bags or fewer. Dealers who had legitimately hedged their holdings were unable to buy in. The Exchange officials showed no disposition to relieve the situation; and as all prices had reached the maximum price for every month permitted, the food administration, on November 1, 1918, ordered the liquidation of all contracts outstanding, bought or sold, by not later than November 9. This was done; and the coffee covered by such contracts was released to the trade. The regulations governing transactions on the Exchange were withdrawn on December 5, 1918; and, after a long argument, the Exchange decided to re-open for trading on December 26, 1918. Opening transactions amounted to 25,000 bags on a basis of seventeen and one-half cents per pound or nine cents over the prices at which contracts had been liquidated. On December 28 the price had declined to fifteen and one-half cents. In the opinion of many of our best merchants, the Exchange should have been closed during the war, as it failed to be of any real service. That it was operating at a fixed price for the spot month only, made it of no value to the trade during this period. Of its loyalty to the government, and its evident desire to assist there can be no question; but its cheerful acceptance of the burdens laid upon it proved largely futile. The action of the food administration in confining the coffee business solely to licensed dealers and to a fixed profit on actual cost; in limiting dealers to ninety days stock; and in prohibiting resales, was the cause of much unjust criticism. The regulations were based on the general rules of the food administration, and applied to coffee quite as equitably as did the regulations governing other food commodities under control and license. As a matter of fact, they were much less rigorous in some ways than the regulations applying to many other articles. For example, ninety days stock based on sales for 1916-17 was allowed on coffee. There was no other article on the food list to which this liberality was permitted. A forty to sixty days stock would probably be found to be the maximum permitted to be carried
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726  
727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Exchange

 

coffee

 

regulations

 

contracts

 

December

 

permitted

 
administration
 
maximum
 

November

 

prices


dealers

 
ninety
 

transactions

 

governing

 
limiting
 

profit

 

Dealers

 
jobbers
 

allowed

 

situation


futile

 

largely

 

proved

 
action
 

licensed

 
delivery
 

future

 

prohibiting

 

actual

 

business


solely

 

confining

 

acceptance

 

October

 

loyalty

 

government

 

period

 

evident

 

desire

 

cheerful


resales
 

burdens

 

question

 

assist

 

criticism

 

articles

 

applying

 

article

 

carried

 

liberality