FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2189   2190   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   2208   2209   2210   2211   2212   2213  
2214   2215   2216   2217   2218   2219   2220   2221   2222   2223   2224   2225   2226   2227   2228   2229   2230   2231   2232   2233   2234   2235   2236   2237   2238   >>   >|  
1837 REV. AND DEAR SIR,--Yours is before me. A sickness of three month's standing (typhus fever) in which I have just escaped death, and which still confines me to my house, renders it impossible for me to answer your letter at large. 1. The precepts of the New Testament respecting the demeanor of slaves and of their masters, beyond all question, recognize the existence of slavery. The masters are in part "believing masters," so that a precept to them, how they are to behave as masters, recognizes that the relation may still exist, _salva fide et salva ecclesia_, ("without violating the Christian faith or the church.") Otherwise, Paul had nothing to do but to cut the band asunder at once. He could not lawfully and properly temporize with a _malum in se_, ("that which is in itself sin.") If any one doubts, let him take the case of Paul's sending Onesimus back to Philemon, with an apology for his running away, and sending him back to be his servant for life. The relation did exist, may exist. The _abuse_ of it is the essential and fundamental wrong. Not that the theory of slavery is in itself right. No; "Love thy neighbor as thyself," "Do unto others that which ye would that others should do unto you," decide against this. But the relation once constituted and continued, is not such a _malum in se_ as calls for immediate and violent disruption at all hazards. So Paul did not counsel. 2. 1 Tim. vi. 2, expresses the sentiment, that slaves, who are Christians and have Christian masters, are not, on that account, and because _as Christians they are brethren_, to forego the reverence due to them as masters. That is, the relation of master and slave is not, as a matter of course, abrogated between all Christians. Nay, servants should in such a case, _a fortiori_, do their duty cheerfully. This sentiment lies on the very face of the case. What the master's duty in such a case may be in respect to _liberation_, is another question, and one which the apostle does not here treat of. 3. Every one knows, who is acquainted with Greek or Latin antiquities, that slavery among heathen nations has ever been more unqualified and at looser ends than among Christian nations. Slaves were _property_ in Greece and Rome. That decides all questions about their _relation_. Their treatment depended, as it does now, on the temper of their masters. The power of th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2189   2190   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   2208   2209   2210   2211   2212   2213  
2214   2215   2216   2217   2218   2219   2220   2221   2222   2223   2224   2225   2226   2227   2228   2229   2230   2231   2232   2233   2234   2235   2236   2237   2238   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

masters

 
relation
 

Christians

 

slavery

 

Christian

 

question

 

sentiment

 

master

 

sending

 

slaves


nations

 

brethren

 

forego

 

decide

 

reverence

 

violent

 

hazards

 

counsel

 

account

 

disruption


continued

 

expresses

 

constituted

 

depended

 

heathen

 

antiquities

 

acquainted

 

unqualified

 
treatment
 

Greece


property

 

decides

 
questions
 

looser

 

Slaves

 

cheerfully

 

fortiori

 

servants

 

abrogated

 

temper


apostle

 

respect

 
liberation
 

matter

 

Onesimus

 
Testament
 

respecting

 

demeanor

 

precepts

 
impossible