FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   2208   2209   2210   2211   2212   2213   2214   2215  
2216   2217   2218   2219   2220   2221   2222   2223   2224   2225   2226   2227   2228   2229   2230   2231   2232   2233   2234   2235   2236   2237   2238   2239   2240   >>   >|  
t in attempting to prove that Jesus Christ is not in favor of American slavery, we contend with something else than a man of straw. The ungrateful task, which a particular examination of Professor Stuart's letter lays upon us, we hope fairly to dispose of in due season. Enough has now been said to make it clear and certain, that American slavery has its apologists and advocates in the northern pulpit; advocates and apologists, who fall behind few if any of their brethren in the reputation they have acquired, the stations they occupy, and the general influence they are supposed to exert. Is it so? Did slavery exist in Judea, and among the Jews, in its worst form, during the Savior's incarnation? If the Jews held slaves, they must have done in open and flagrant violation of the letter and the spirit of the Mosaic Dispensation. Whoever has any doubts of this may well resolve his doubts in the light of the Argument entitled "The Bible against Slavery." If, after a careful and thorough examination of that article, he can believe that slaveholding prevailed during the ministry of Jesus Christ among the Jews and in accordance with the authority of Moses, he would do the reading public an important service to record the grounds of his belief--especially in a fair and full refutation of that Argument. Till that is done, we hold ourselves excused from attempting to prove what we now repeat, that if the Jews during our Savior's incarnation held slaves, they must have done so in open and flagrant violation of the letter and spirit of the Mosaic Dispensation. Could Christ and the Apostles every where among their countrymen come in contact with slaveholding, being as it was a gross violation of that law which their office and their profession required them to honor and enforce, without exposing and condemning it? In its worst forms, we are told, slavery prevailed over the whole world, not excepting Judea. As, according to such ecclesiastics as Stuart, Hodge and Fisk, slavery in itself is not bad at all, the term "_worst_" could be applied only to "_abuses_" of this innocent relation. Slavery accordingly existed among the Jews, disfigured and disgraced by the "worst abuses" to which it is liable. These abuses in the ancient world, Professor Stuart describes as "horrible cruelties." And in our own country, such abuses have grown so rank, as to lead a distinguished eye-witness--no less a philosopher and statesman than Thomas Jeffer
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   2208   2209   2210   2211   2212   2213   2214   2215  
2216   2217   2218   2219   2220   2221   2222   2223   2224   2225   2226   2227   2228   2229   2230   2231   2232   2233   2234   2235   2236   2237   2238   2239   2240   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

slavery

 

abuses

 
letter
 

Stuart

 

Christ

 

violation

 

Slavery

 

Argument

 

advocates

 

slaveholding


apologists

 

flagrant

 

prevailed

 

spirit

 

Mosaic

 

attempting

 
American
 

incarnation

 

Savior

 

doubts


Dispensation

 

slaves

 

examination

 

Professor

 
excepting
 

countrymen

 

contact

 
Apostles
 

excused

 
repeat

exposing
 
condemning
 

enforce

 

office

 

profession

 

required

 

country

 
cruelties
 
ancient
 

describes


horrible

 
distinguished
 
statesman
 

Thomas

 

Jeffer

 

philosopher

 
witness
 

liable

 

ecclesiastics

 

applied