FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2114   2115   2116   2117   2118   2119   2120   2121   2122   2123   2124   2125   2126   2127   2128   2129   2130   2131   2132   2133   2134   2135   2136   2137   2138  
2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152   2153   2154   2155   2156   2157   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   2163   >>   >|  
e compromising expedient of the Constitution be mutually adopted, which regards them as inhabitants, but as debased by servitude below the equal level of free inhabitants, which regards the _slave_ as divested of two-fifths of the _man_. DEBATES IN FIRST CONGRESS. LLOYD'S DEBATES. May 13, 1789. Mr. PARKER (of Va.) moved to insert a clause in the bill, imposing a duty on the importation of slaves of ten dollars each person. He was sorry that the Constitution prevented Congress from prohibiting the importation altogether; he thought it a defect in that instrument that it allowed of such actions, it was contrary to the revolution principles, and ought not to be permitted; but as he could not do all the good he desired, he was willing to do what lay in his power. He hoped such a duty as he moved for would prevent, in some degree, this irrational and inhuman traffic; if so, he should feel happy from the success of his motion. Mr. SMITH (of South Carolina,) hoped that such an important and serious proposition as this would not be hastily adopted; it was a very late moment for the introduction of new subjects. He expected the committee had got through the business, and would rise without discussing any thing further; at least, if gentlemen were determined on considering the present motion, he hoped they would delay for a few days, in order to give time for an examination of the subject. It was certainly a matter big with the most serious consequences to the State he represented; be did not think any one thing that had been discussed was so important to them, and the welfare of the Union, as the question now brought forward, but he was not prepared to enter on any argument, and therefore requested the motion might either be withdrawn or laid on the table. Mr. SHERMAN (of Ct.) approved of the object of the motion, but he did not think this bill was proper to embrace the subject. He could not reconcile himself to the insertion of human beings as an article of duty, among goods, wares and merchandise. He hoped it would be withdrawn for the present, and taken up hereafter as an independent subject. Mr. JACKSON, (of Geo.) observing the quarter from which this motion came, said it did not surprise him, though it might have that effect on others. He recollected that Virginia was an old settled State, and had her complement of slaves, so she was careless of recruiting her numbers by this means; the natural incr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2114   2115   2116   2117   2118   2119   2120   2121   2122   2123   2124   2125   2126   2127   2128   2129   2130   2131   2132   2133   2134   2135   2136   2137   2138  
2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152   2153   2154   2155   2156   2157   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   2163   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

motion

 

subject

 
importation
 

slaves

 

withdrawn

 

present

 

important

 

inhabitants

 

adopted

 

Constitution


DEBATES

 

forward

 

brought

 

question

 

welfare

 

prepared

 
compromising
 

expedient

 

argument

 

discussed


requested

 

mutually

 

examination

 

represented

 
SHERMAN
 

consequences

 

matter

 
object
 

effect

 
recollected

Virginia
 
surprise
 

settled

 

numbers

 

natural

 

recruiting

 

careless

 
complement
 
quarter
 

insertion


beings

 
article
 
reconcile
 

approved

 

proper

 

embrace

 
independent
 

JACKSON

 

observing

 

merchandise