FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   2163   2164   2165   2166   2167   2168   2169   2170   2171   2172   2173   2174   2175   2176   2177   2178   2179   2180   2181   2182  
2183   2184   2185   2186   2187   2188   2189   2190   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   >>   >|  
n exact parallel to that feature in the Constitution of the United States which makes the master the representative of his slave.'--'The Constitution of the United States expressly prescribes that no title of nobility shall be granted by the United States. The spirit of this interdict is not a rooted antipathy to the grant of mere powerless empty _titles_, but to titles of _nobility_; to the institution of privileged orders of men. But what order of men under the most absolute of monarchies, or the most aristocratic of republics, was ever invested with such an odious and unjust privilege as that of the separate and exclusive representation of less than half a million owners of slaves, in the Hall of this House, in the chair of the Senate, and in the Presidential mansion?'--'This investment of power in the owners of one species of property concentrated in the highest authorities of the nation, and disseminated through thirteen of the twenty-six States of the Union, constitutes a privileged order of men in the community, more adverse to the rights of all, and more pernicious to the interests of the whole, than any order of nobility ever known. To call government thus constituted a Democracy, is to insult the understanding of mankind. To call it an Aristocracy, is to do injustice to that form of government. Aristocracy is the government of the _best_. Its standard qualification for accession to power is _merit_, ascertained by popular election, recurring at short intervals of time. If even that government is prone to degenerate into tyranny, what must be the character of that form of polity in which the standard qualification for access to power is wealth in the possession of slaves? It is doubly tainted with the infection of riches and of slavery. _There is no name in the language of national jurisprudence that can define it_--no model in the records of ancient history, or in the political theories of Aristotle, with which it can be likened. It was introduced into the Constitution of the United States by an equivocation--a representation of property under the name of persons. Little did the members of the Convention from the free States imagine or foresee what a sacrifice to Moloch was hidden under the mask of this concession.'--'The House of Representatives of the U. States consists of 223 members--all, by the _letter_ of the Constitution, representatives only of _persons_, as 135 of them really are; but the other 88, equ
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   2163   2164   2165   2166   2167   2168   2169   2170   2171   2172   2173   2174   2175   2176   2177   2178   2179   2180   2181   2182  
2183   2184   2185   2186   2187   2188   2189   2190   2191   2192   2193   2194   2195   2196   2197   2198   2199   2200   2201   2202   2203   2204   2205   2206   2207   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

government

 
Constitution
 

United

 

nobility

 

persons

 

owners

 

slaves

 

members

 

representation


property

 

Aristocracy

 

privileged

 

qualification

 

titles

 

standard

 
doubly
 

election

 

popular

 

riches


possession

 

accession

 

tainted

 

infection

 
ascertained
 

access

 

slavery

 
degenerate
 

tyranny

 
polity

recurring
 
character
 

intervals

 

wealth

 

Aristotle

 

Representatives

 

consists

 
concession
 
sacrifice
 

Moloch


hidden

 
letter
 
representatives
 

foresee

 

imagine

 

records

 
ancient
 

history

 

political

 

define